8000 chore: simplify the colorize template function by almas-x · Pull Request #777 · goravel/framework · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

chore: simplify the colorize template function #777

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in 8000 to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

chore: simplify the colorize template function #777

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

almas-x
Copy link
Contributor
@almas-x almas-x commented Dec 20, 2024

📑 Description

Replaced template parsing with style tag support for inline text styling.

For more details on style tags, visit: https://gookit.github.io/color/#/?id=tag-attributes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced text colorization in CLI output for improved readability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated usage message formatting for integer flags in tests to align with new styling directives.
  • Documentation

    • Expanded comments for the colorize function to clarify its functionality and support for style tags.

✅ Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

@almas-x almas-x requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2024 02:20
8000
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the console/cli_helper.go and console/cli_helper_test.go files, focusing on simplifying the text colorization functionality. The primary change is in the colorize function, which has been streamlined to directly apply default color to input text, removing the previous template-based approach. The test file's usage string for an integer flag has been updated to use a new color directive format, reflecting the changes in the colorization method.

Changes

File Change Summary
console/cli_helper.go - Simplified colorize function to directly apply color
- Removed colorizeTemp variable
- Updated function comments for clarity on new color support
console/cli_helper_test.go - Updated IntFlag usage string from template format to new color directive format

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: improve artisan command output readability #766: The changes in this PR enhance the readability of command output by incorporating multi-color formatting, which is directly related to the modifications made to the colorize function in the main PR that also focuses on color application in CLI output.

Suggested reviewers

  • hwbrzzl

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c51b36 and 96d41d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • console/cli_helper.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • console/cli_helper.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

hwbrzzl
hwbrzzl previously approved these changes Dec 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.95%. Comparing base (f839c55) to head (3ae3920).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #777      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.96%   69.95%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         213      213              
  Lines       18177    18172       -5     
==========================================
- Hits        12718    12713       -5     
  Misses       4762     4762              
  Partials      697      697              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2d2fe8 and 1c51b36.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • console/cli_helper.go (1 hunks)
  • console/cli_helper_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
console/cli_helper_test.go (1)

146-146: LGTM: Usage string updated to use style tags

The test has been correctly updated to use the new style tag format <fg=blue>int</> flag instead of the template format.

Let's verify the test coverage:

✅ Verification successful

Test coverage for style tags is complete and consistent

The verification confirms that:

  • No old template format ({{...}}) remains in the test file
  • Only one style tag instance exists and it's using the new format correctly
  • No other color-related test cases were found that would need updating
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all test cases cover the new style tag format
rg -A 2 '<fg=.*?>' console/cli_helper_test.go

Length of output: 95


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other test cases still using the old template format
rg -A 2 '{{.*?blue.*?}}' console/cli_helper_test.go

# Also check for any other color templates to ensure complete coverage
rg -A 2 '{{.*?(red|green|yellow|blue|magenta|cyan|white|black).*?}}' console/cli_helper_test.go

Length of output: 375


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other test cases still using the old template format
# Escaping the curly braces properly this time
rg -A 2 '\{\{.*blue.*\}\}' console/cli_helper_test.go

# Also check for any other color templates to ensure complete coverage
rg -A 2 '\{\{.*(red|green|yellow|blue|magenta|cyan|white|black).*\}\}' console/cli_helper_test.go

# Let's also check for any other style tags to ensure consistency
rg -A 2 '<fg=.*?>' console/cli_helper_test.go

Length of output: 251

console/cli_helper.go (2)

181-183: Great documentation improvement

Clear documentation with a helpful link to the style tag reference.


181-185: Consider architectural consistency with templates

While moving to style tags is a good direction, the codebase still heavily relies on template-based color functions (colorsFuncMap). Consider:

  1. Whether both styling approaches should coexist
  2. If a complete migration to style tags would be cleaner
  3. How this affects template rendering performance

Let's analyze the t 8000 emplate usage:

@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor
hwbrzzl commented Dec 20, 2024

Please solve the conflict

@almas-x
Copy link
Contributor Author
almas-x commented Dec 20, 2024

Please solve the conflict

Done!

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl merged commit 8e5426f into goravel:master Dec 20, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may clo 391A se these issues.

2 participants
0