-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
chore: update renovate config to enable automerge #779
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves two primary changes: the deletion of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #779 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 69.96% 69.96%
=======================================
Files 213 213
Lines 18177 18177
=======================================
Hits 12718 12718
Misses 4762 4762
Partials 697 697 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
renovate.json (2)
14-14
: Ensure branch protection rules are properly configuredEnabling
platformAutomerge
is efficient but requires proper branch protection rules to ensure all necessary checks pass before merging.Verify that your branch protection rules include:
- Required status checks
- Required reviews
- Up-to-date branch requirement
22-27
: LGTM! Consider monitoring automerge effectivenessThe package rules are well-configured:
- Safely excludes major updates from automerge
- Includes appropriate update types (pin, patch, minor)
- Clear description of the automerge scope
Consider adding a
stabilityDays
setting to delay automerging until updates have proven stable:{ "groupName": "all dependencies", "groupSlug": "all", "description": "Automerge non-major updates", "matchUpdateTypes": [ "digest", "pin", "patch", "minor" ], - "automerge": true + "automerge": true, + "stabilityDays": 3 }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS
(0 hunks)renovate.json
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/CODEOWNERS
🔇 Additional comments (1)
renovate.json (1)
10-13
: Verify lock file maintenance strategy
While enabling automatic lock file maintenance is beneficial for keeping dependencies fresh, automatic merging of these updates should be carefully considered. Lock file updates can sometimes introduce unexpected changes.
Run this script to analyze the current lock file update patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Lock file maintenance configuration is appropriate for this Go project
The enabled lock file maintenance with automerge is a safe configuration for this project because:
- This is a Go project using
go.mod
for dependency management - Renovate is configured with
gomodTidy
post-update option, ensuring clean dependency tree - The project has robust CI workflows including tests, linting, and vulnerability checks that run on PRs
- Lock file updates are limited to non-major versions (patch, minor) which minimizes breaking change risks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check recent lock file changes to understand update patterns
# and potential impact of automating these updates
# Look for lock files in the repository
fd -e lock
# Check git history for lock file changes to understand update patterns
for lockfile in $(fd -e lock); do
echo "=== Changes in $lockfile ==="
git log --oneline -n 5 -- "$lockfile" 2>/dev/null
done
Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for package-lock.json, yarn.lock, or pnpm-lock.yaml files
fd -E node_modules -E dist "package-lock\.json|yarn\.lock|pnpm-lock\.yaml"
# Let's also check the package manager being used
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "=== Package.json content ==="
cat package.json | jq '.packageManager'
fi
# Check if there are any dependency-related workflows
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ | xargs cat
Length of output: 3470
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if this is a Go project and how dependencies are managed
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
echo "=== Go.mod content ==="
cat go.mod
fi
# Check if there are any automated dependency update workflows
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ | xargs grep -l "renovate\|dependabot"
# Check existing renovate configuration
if [ -f "renovate.json" ]; then
echo "=== Current Renovate Config ==="
cat renovate.json
fi
Length of output: 8994
📑 Description
Closes https://github.com/goravel/goravel/issues/?
Summary by CodeRabbit
✅ Checks