8000 feat: worker semaphore v2 by grutt · Pull Request #540 · hatchet-dev/hatchet · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

feat: worker semaphore v2 #540

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

feat: worker semaphore v2 #540

merged 34 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

grutt
Copy link
Contributor
@grutt grutt commented May 29, 2024

Description

Previous worker semaphore approach led to blocking table level isolation #535.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

What's Changed

  • Replaced Worker Semaphore object with table of slots

@vercel Vercel
Copy link
vercel bot commented May 29, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
hatchet-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 4, 2024 2:15pm

@grutt grutt marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2024 21:17
@grutt grutt requested a review from abelanger5 May 31, 2024 21:17
abelanger5
abelanger5 requested changes Jun 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
@grutt grutt merged commit 8b1417b into main Jun 4, 2024
19 checks passed
@grutt grutt deleted the feat--worker-semaphore-v2 branch June 4, 2024 14:56
@grutt grutt mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@abelanger5 abelanger5 abelanger5 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@grutt @abelanger5
0