8000 Use references in config flow for solaredge by cereal2nd · Pull Request #43511 · home-assistant/core · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Use references in config flow for solaredge #43511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

cereal2nd
Copy link
Contributor
@cereal2nd cereal2nd commented Nov 22, 2020

Proposed change

Updating the solaredge config flow to use references see #40578

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

  • No score or internal
  • 🥈 Silver
  • 🥇 Gold
  • 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

Copy link
Contributor
@bouwew bouwew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good changes!

One more suggestion, the _check_site-function can be optimized:

    def _check_site(self, site_id, api_key) -> bool:
        """Check if we can connect to the soleredge api service."""
        api = solaredge.Solaredge(api_key)
        try:
            response = api.get_details(site_id)
            if response["details"]["status"].lower() != "active":
                self._errors[CONF_SITE_ID] = "site_not_active"
                return False
        except (ConnectTimeout, HTTPError):
            self._errors[CONF_SITE_ID] = "could_not_connect"
            return False
        except KeyError:
            self._errors[CONF_SITE_ID] = "invalid_api_key"
            return False
        return True

@cereal2nd
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good changes!

One more suggestion, the _check_site-function can be optimized:

    def _check_site(self, site_id, api_key) -> bool:
        """Check if we can connect to the soleredge api service."""
        api = solaredge.Solaredge(api_key)
        try:
            response = api.get_details(site_id)
            if response["details"]["status"].lower() != "active":
                self._errors[CONF_SITE_ID] = "site_not_active"
                return False
        except (ConnectTimeout, HTTPError):
            self._errors[CONF_SITE_ID] = "could_not_connect"
            return False
        except KeyError:
            self._errors[CONF_SITE_ID] = "invalid_api_key"
            return False
        return True

Yes ideed, its a lot more readable this way

Copy link
Contributor
@bouwew bouwew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good!

@cgarwood cgarwood merged commit 059f1a3 into home-assistant:dev Nov 23, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
@cereal2nd cereal2nd deleted the 40578 branch September 26, 2022 12:24
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? 68B5 Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0