8000 chore(docs): Add OpenSSF Best Practices Badge by andreyvelich · Pull Request #2611 · kubeflow/trainer · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

chore(docs): Add OpenSSF Best Practices Badge #2611

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2025

Conversation

andreyvelich
Copy link
Member

Part of: kubeflow/community#834

I added the OpenSSF badge for Kubeflow Trainer project that is required for CNCF graduation.

/cc @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @Electronic-Waste @astefanutti @rimolive @varodrig @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee

Copy link

@andreyvelich: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee.

Note that only kubeflow members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

Part of: kubeflow/community#834

I added the OpenSSF badge for Kubeflow Trainer project that is required for CNCF graduation.

/cc @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @Electronic-Waste @astefanutti @rimolive @varodrig @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@andreyvelich andreyvelich changed the title chore(readme): Add OpenSSF Best Practices Badge chore(docs): Add OpenSSF Best Practices Badge Apr 22, 2025
Copy link
Member
@Electronic-Waste Electronic-Waste left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @andreyvelich!

/lgtm

@franciscojavierarceo
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@andreyvelich
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

We are discussing during today's call that we might want to use shared account for Kubeflow OpenSSF badge.

@coveralls
Copy link
coveralls commented Apr 22, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15357841602

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 28.807%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 15284619907: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 840
Relevant Lines: 2916

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member
@terrytangyuan terrytangyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: franciscojavierarceo, terrytangyuan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@andreyvelich
Copy link
Member Author

Given that we can't register Kubeflow Google Group email with OpenSSF, we decided to go ahead with personal accounts for now.
/hold cancel

@andreyvelich
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Signed-off-by: Andrey Velichkevich <andrey.velichkevich@gmail.com>
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot removed the lgtm label May 30, 2025
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit f654a4a into kubeflow:master Jun 4, 2025
17 checks passed
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added this to the v2.0 milestone Jun 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants
1639
0