8000 Add DisableSameLayerUnpack option to cri config by dcantah · Pull Request #16 · kevpar/cri · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add DisableSameLayerUnpack option to cri config #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2022

Conversation

dcantah
Copy link
Collaborator
@dcantah dcantah commented Jan 7, 2022

This change adds a new option named DisableSameLayerUnpack that stops Containerd from being able to unpack the same layer in parallel. This is most common if a pull of the same image is performed at the same time or different images that share layers being pulled at the same time.

This change relies on kevpar/containerd#33 landing to make use of the containerd.WithDisableSameLayerUnpack() option so I've left it as a draft for now to avoid an accidental merge but this is free to review.

@dcantah
Copy link
Collaborator Author
dcantah commented Jan 7, 2022

@dcantah dcantah marked this pull request as draft January 7, 2022 00:33
@helsaawy helsaawy self-assigned this Jan 7, 2022
@dcantah
Copy link
Collaborator Author
dcantah commented Mar 8, 2022

Ok this merged kevpar/containerd#33. Need to vendor in our fork here and then we can get this in

This change adds a new option named DisableSameLayerUnpack that stops
Containerd from being able to unpack the same layer in parallel. This is
most common if a pull of the same image is performed at the same time
or different images that share layers being pulled at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Canter <dcanter@microsoft.com>
@dcantah dcantah marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2022 19:38
@dcantah dcantah merged commit 4e635ab into kevpar:windows_port Mar 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0