-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.4k
Remove obsolete information from the Keycloak deployment #40376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove obsolete information from the Keycloak deployment #40376
Conversation
Closes keycloak#40375 Signed-off-by: Alexander Schwartz <aschwart@redhat.com>
@ryanemerson - can you please review this issue when you have the time? The YAML files contain a lot of changes, but the rendered docs only show some slightly changed Keycloak deployment. Thanks! |
configListener: | ||
enabled: false | ||
container: | ||
extraJvmOpts: '-Dorg.infinispan.openssl=false -Dinfinispan.cluster.name=ISPN -Djgroups.xsite.fd.interval=2000 -Djgroups.xsite.fd.timeout=15000' | ||
extraJvmOpts: '-Dorg.infinispan.openssl=false -Dorg.infinispan.threads.virtual=true -Dinfinispan.cluster.name=ISPN -Djgroups.xsite.fd.interval=2000 -Djgroups.xsite.fd.timeout=15000 -Dotel.traces.sampler=parentbased_always_off' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-Dorg.infinispan.threads.virtual=true
is redundant now as we enable by default if there is sufficient parallelism. We should probably remove this from keycloak-benchmark so that it does not make it into the Keycloak docs when we copy over the files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't realise we didn't show the extraJvmOpts
, so this isn't really a concern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
... and I just remembered we're deploying Infinispan separately, so it is in fact needed until infinispan/infinispan#14579 lands in 16 🙃
Should we be including this property in the example Infinispan CRs given this is what we're testing with?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK it is not officially supported in RHDG, so I'd say no.
@mhajas - can you please approve this PR based on Ryan's review? Thanks! |
Closes #40375