8000 upsert scenario for async item controller by ludeknovy · Pull Request #188 · ludeknovy/jtl-reporter-be · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

upsert scenario for async item controller #188

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

ludeknovy
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #188 (9636c0a) into master (92c57f5) will increase coverage by 0.61%.
The diff coverage is 36.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #188      +/-   ##
===
9CE0
=======================================
+ Coverage   49.38%   50.00%   +0.61%     
==========================================
  Files          75       76       +1     
  Lines        1213     1220       +7     
  Branches       96       96              
==========================================
+ Hits          599      610      +11     
+ Misses        605      601       -4     
  Partials        9        9              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 50.00% <36.66%> (+0.61%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...r/controllers/item/create-item-async-controller.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../server/controllers/item/create-item-controller.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../server/controllers/item/shared/upsert-scenario.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ludeknovy ludeknovy merged commit 2e135aa into master Dec 20, 2022
@ludeknovy ludeknovy deleted the feature/scenario-autoprovisioning-async-create-item-controller branch December 20, 2022 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0