8000 Use a time provider instead on `ValidAt` constraint by lcobucci · Pull Request #180 · lcobucci/jwt · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Use a time provider instead on ValidAt constraint #180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2017

Conversation

lcobucci
Copy link
Owner
@lcobucci lcobucci commented May 7, 2017

So that we can separate the constraint initialisation from the validation itself and then be able to map validation constraints in a dependency injection container.

@lcobucci lcobucci added this to the 4.0.0 milestone May 7, 2017
@lcobucci lcobucci self-assigned this May 7, 2017
@lcobucci lcobucci requested review from henriquemoody and Ocramius May 7, 2017 20:31
So that we can separate the constraint initialisation from the
validation itself and then be able to map validation constraints in a
dependency injection container.

Closes #139
@lcobucci lcobucci force-pushed the feature/use-clock branch from d40422a to fc1d2dc Compare May 7, 2017 21:15
@lcobucci
Copy link
Owner Author
lcobucci commented May 7, 2017

@Ocramius @henriquemoody sorry guys but I'll merge this one... I want to release an alpha version so I can send a PR to fix psr7-sessions/storageless#61 😉

Let me know if you find anything weird and we fix it in master.

@lcobucci lcobucci merged commit fc1d2dc into master May 7, 2017
@lcobucci lcobucci deleted the feature/use-clock branch May 7, 2017 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0