[Verif] Introduce Formal Contracts #7325
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… dev/dobios/new-verif-ops
TaoBi22
reviewed
Jul 16, 2024
uenoku
reviewed
Jul 16, 2024
maerhart
reviewed
Jul 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: Bea Healy <57840981+TaoBi22@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bea Healy <57840981+TaoBi22@users.noreply.github.com>
…to dev/dobios/formal-contract
uenoku
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
uenoku
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
uenoku
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
1E0A
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes a new set of ops aimed at enabling the use of formal contracts to abstract away module instances during verification. This is described in this proposal.
There is still some work needed to handle these ops in PrepareForFormal, which will be done in a later PR.
Depends on #7145 .