8000 [Matrix] Propagate shape information through Select insts by jroelofs · Pull Request #141876 · llvm/llvm-project · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[Matrix] Propagate shape information through Select insts #141876

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jroelofs
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member
llvmbot commented May 28, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: Jon Roelofs (jroelofs)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141876.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerMatrixIntrinsics.cpp (+47-1)
  • (added) llvm/test/Transforms/LowerMatrixIntrinsics/select.ll (+26)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerMatrixIntrinsics.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerMatrixIntrinsics.cpp
index 756a72e6d97bc..6cfe077b602d3 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerMatrixIntrinsics.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerMatrixIntrinsics.cpp
@@ -269,6 +269,15 @@ computeShapeInfoForInst(Instruction *I,
       return OpShape->second;
   }
 
+  if (isa<SelectInst>(I)) {
+    auto OpShape = ShapeMap.find(I->getOperand(1));
+    if (OpShape != ShapeMap.end())
+      return OpShape->second;
+    OpShape = ShapeMap.find(I->getOperand(2));
+    if (OpShape != ShapeMap.end())
+      return OpShape->second;
+  }
+
   if (isUniformShape(I)) {
     // Find the first operand that has a known shape and use that.
     for (auto &Op : I->operands()) {
@@ -623,7 +632,7 @@ class LowerMatrixIntrinsics {
       default:
         return false;
       }
-    return isUniformShape(V) || isa<StoreInst>(V) || isa<LoadInst>(V);
+    return isUniformShape(V) || isa<StoreInst>(V) || isa<LoadInst>(V) || isa<SelectInst>(V);
   }
 
   /// Propagate the shape information of instructions to their users.
@@ -710,6 +719,12 @@ class LowerMatrixIntrinsics {
       } else if (isa<StoreInst>(V)) {
         // Nothing to do.  We forward-propagated to this so we would just
         // backward propagate to an instruction with an already known shape.
+      } else if (auto *Select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(V)) {
+        ShapeInfo Shape = ShapeMap[V];
+        if (setShapeInfo(Select->getOperand(1), Shape))
+          pushInstruction(Select, WorkList);
+        if (setShapeInfo(Select->getOperand(2), Shape))
+          pushInstruction(Select, WorkList);
       } else if (isUniformShape(V)) {
         // Propagate to all operands.
         ShapeInfo Shape = ShapeMap[V];
@@ -1068,6 +1083,8 @@ class LowerMatrixIntrinsics {
         Changed |= VisitBinaryOperator(BinOp);
       if (auto *UnOp = dyn_cast<UnaryOperator>(Inst))
         Changed |= VisitUnaryOperator(UnOp);
+      if (auto *Select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Inst))
+        Changed |= VisitSelectInst(Select);
       if (match(Inst, m_Load(m_Value(Op1))))
         Changed |= VisitLoad(cast<LoadInst>(Inst), Op1, Builder);
       else if (match(Inst, m_Store(m_Value(Op1), m_Value(Op2))))
@@ -2198,6 +2215,35 @@ class LowerMatrixIntrinsics {
     return true;
   }
 
+  /// Lower selects, if shape information is available.
+  bool VisitSelectInst(SelectInst *Inst) {
+    auto I = ShapeMap.find(Inst);
+    if (I == ShapeMap.end())
+      return false;
+
+    Value *Cond = Inst->getOperand(0);
+    Value *OpA = Inst->getOperand(1);
+    Value *OpB = Inst->getOperand(2);
+
+    IRBuilder<> Builder(Inst);
+    ShapeInfo &Shape = I->second;
+
+    MatrixTy Result;
+    MatrixTy A = getMatrix(OpA, Shape, Builder);
+    MatrixTy B = getMatrix(OpB, Shape, Builder);
+
+    for (unsigned I = 0; I < Shape.getNumVectors(); ++I) {
+      auto *Sel = Builder.CreateSelect(Cond, A.getVector(I), B.getVector(I));
+      Result.addVector(Sel);
+    }
+
+    finalizeLowering(Inst,
+                     Result.addNumComputeOps(getNumOps(Result.getVectorTy()) *
+                                             Result.getNumVectors()),
+                     Builder);
+    return true;
+  }
+
   /// Helper to linearize a matrix expression tree into a string. Currently
   /// matrix expressions are linarized by starting at an expression leaf and
   /// linearizing bottom up.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerMatrixIntrinsics/select.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerMatrixIntrinsics/select.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..acfd9228ee17a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerMatrixIntrinsics/select.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -passes='lower-matrix-intrinsics' -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define void @select_2x2(i1 %cond, ptr %lhs, ptr %rhs, ptr %out) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @select_2x2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COL_LOAD:%.*]] = load <2 x float>, ptr [[LHS:%.*]], align 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[VEC_GEP:%.*]] = getelementptr float, ptr [[LHS]], i64 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COL_LOAD1:%.*]] = load <2 x float>, ptr [[VEC_GEP]], align 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COL_LOAD2:%.*]] = load <2 x float>, ptr [[RHS:%.*]], align 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[VEC_GEP3:%.*]] = getelementptr float, ptr [[RHS]], i64 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[COL_LOAD4:%.*]] = load <2 x float>, ptr [[VEC_GEP3]], align 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND:%.*]], <2 x float> [[COL_LOAD]], <2 x float> [[COL_LOAD2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP2:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND]], <2 x float> [[COL_LOAD1]], <2 x float> [[COL_LOAD4]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store <2 x float> [[TMP1]], ptr [[OUT:%.*]], align 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[VEC_GEP5:%.*]] = getelementptr float, ptr [[OUT]], i64 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store <2 x float> [[TMP2]], ptr [[VEC_GEP5]], align 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %lhsv = load <4 x float>, ptr %lhs
+  %rhsv = load <4 x float>, ptr %rhs
+  %op = select i1 %cond, <4 x float> %lhsv, <4 x float> %rhsv
+  %opt  = call <4 x float> @llvm.matrix.transpose(<4 x float> %op, i32 2, i32 2)
+  %optt = call <4 x float> @llvm.matrix.transpose(<4 x float> %opt, i32 2, i32 2)
+  store <4 x float> %optt, ptr %out
+  ret void
+}

@jroelofs jroelofs force-pushed the jroelofs/lower-matrix-select branch from fdc3e42 to 85d3716 Compare May 28, 2025 23:21
Copy link
github-actions bot commented May 28, 2025

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

@jroelofs jroelofs force-pushed the jroelofs/lower-matrix-select branch from 85d3716 to 3ad9143 Compare May 28, 2025 23:25
@jroelofs jroelofs force-pushed the jroelofs/lower-matrix-select branch from 3ad9143 to 4040d3f Compare May 30, 2025 01:30
;
%lhsv = load <4 x float>, ptr %lhs
%rhsv = load <4 x float>, ptr %rhs
%op = select i1 %cond, <4 x float> %lhsv, <4 x float> %rhsv
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should probably also have a test where %cond is a vector.

And possibly one where we have shape info for %cond, to make sure we don't pick it for the result.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should pick that operand for the shape info if we have it and it's a vector, right?

Comment on lines 273 to 278
auto OpShape = ShapeMap.find(I->getOperand(1));
if (OpShape != ShapeMap.end())
return OpShape->second;
OpShape = ShapeMap.find(I->getOperand(2));
if (OpShape != ShapeMap.end())
return OpShape->second;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Picking the first operand with shape info should match what we do for uniform shapes, would probably be good to add a similar comment here (or unify the code below by only iterating over op1 & op2 for selects, via something like drop_front(I->operands()) not sure how much extra code that would be)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ooh, that's a little nicer

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should almost match, but not quite: we need to ignore the condition operand for shape info iff it is not a vector.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0