-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Archive: Physically Delete Files After Confirmation #167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thank you for your feedback! We'll keep this suggestion for later... Need to provide a location service and implement editing metadata first. Deleting photos permanently certainly makes sense to free up storage space. Right now, we do a soft delete in the database - so the actual files are not deleted. Please consider a donation if you 8000 like PhotoPrism. We're working on this full-time at the moment. |
Signed-off-by: Michael Mayer <michael@liquidbytes.net>
@kelvinhammond I've just renamed "delete" to "hide" and added a page where you can see and restore hidden photos. Does this work for you? Thank you for supporting our project. Demo will be updated as soon as possible. |
I'm running the latest image from docker and I don't see this option. I would like to be able to just delete a photo altogether (i.e. remove the record from the DB and the files from my disk). Is that possible right now? |
We don't delete physical files at the moment as many users are afraid... might add that option later or do it automatically after 3 months. Would be good to gather some opinions, ideas and expectations before we implement something! |
I guess one thing that would be great is to set some expectations as to what this project offers (or will offer). Here's what I'm planning to use it for, which I'm still not sure will work: I want to basically replace Google Photos (the reason being that I want to host my own photos instead of giving that data to Google). I'm not sure if Photoprism will, eventually, have the most important features that Google Photos has, or if you and the contributors are planning to do such a thing. Here's my wish list if this project tilts towards being a Google Photos replacement:
That said, I'm super glad I found this project and so far I'm enjoying using it. I'm about to move all my library to it just to see how well it scales (around 100GB worth of images). |
Obviously this should also replace Google Photos (or Flickr in my case) for us. Regarding the features:
Let us know about your experience with many files. I'm using it with ~12.000 photos right now and like the performance. Maps might work with up to one million photos if you use it locally, although I would recommend to delete some as many of them are probably not very good! |
I mean more naming the photo, not renaming the file itself.
My library has around 30k photos. So we will see 🤞 I'm sure it's going to take a few days importing/indexing because I'm running this on a very small server with only 2 cores and 2gb of ram. |
Add some swap ;) |
Make sure to at least pre-render small thumbs as your CPU will die otherwise when the browser requests 100 thumbs at once. We'll add an edit dialog for image metadata, that's for sure! Not complicated, so also low priority. |
Running import from the web works for a few seconds and then crashes. If I go into the container and manually run
|
@casidiablo Can you open a separate issue for this please? :) I know there are specific issues with |
Too late ;) Created this issue for the bug: #202 |
I very much appreciate the Archive feature, is it possible to implement a command that would give me list of all archived photos (full path name)? I'd review the list and then perform manual deletion. It looks like PhotoPrism could be my tool of choice for finding out trash photos and generating a list for physical deletion (move). I would like to list both JPEG and RAW/HEIC files if possible to be able to completely cleanup those. |
@lzap Of course that would be possible... Only thing we need to be careful with is not to make our UI too complex with too many buttons and options. |
See #167 (comment) Signed-off-by: Michael Mayer <michael@liquidbytes.net>
This is a fix for unstacking issues in certain situations. More general photo delete functionality will be added later, see #167. Signed-off-by: Michael Mayer <michael@lastzero.net>
Wanted to give this a shot and move 10yrs of iCloud / Google Photos into a self hosted space. Performance as a Docker container so far seems to be very good - however, I still seem to not be able to delete pictures? Not sure what the intend behind this is, but that's a gap. If you want to provide a simple modern UX/UI for photo management - great, you're on track. However part of that UX is or should be, that I am able to delete photos, especially after or during an initial import which I am doing atm. Please reconsider and add a simple delete button in the Archive. Thanks |
Will do. Focus right now is sustainable funding and stability. Worked two years for free. Short break before adding new features. |
Thank you! Feature is working now! |
@lastzero Thank you very much for implementing this feature! |
Possible, since we don't index it in the first place... maybe better put in the cache folder. |
Amazing how the "simple video support" we agreed to implement now becomes a "Mission to Mars" 🚀 |
Just to clarify, thumbs .jpg are deleted, but .avc is not. |
I know, give us a second to fix it 👍 |
Let us know if this works for you! New preview build has been started: https://docs.photoprism.app/getting-started/updates/#development-preview |
Following along closely - let me know if I can offer any support/help here :) thanks for this! can't wait to use this feature! |
Already implemented 👍 Let me know if you need help activating it! |
I am struggling with the delete feature. After moving a photo to the archive, the only option is to restore the image. How can I delete a photo and why is it so difficult? |
This feature is an early access feature for our sponsors. If you become a sponsor we let you know how to enable it. Otherwise you need to wait until it will become available for everyone :) |
Any updates on when this crucial and basic feature will no longer be in "early access" (if that's what you want to call it)? |
Any updates on when we reach our funding goal or when you notice this is generally available now? |
Not sure what "generally available" means. Do you mean publicly available? Latest version still does not allow me to enable the "delete" feature in settings without becoming a sponsor. |
Which version specifically? Did you update properly or do you need support? Which GitHub page still says you need to be a sponsor? Generally available means it's not an early-access feature anymore. |
Label has been removed, hope this helps you to calm down a bit. |
Let us tell you this once again as you don't seem to understand: Your feeling of entitlement is completely misguided. You can and could always simply delete directly in the filesystem using ANY tool or a terminal and then index. You can also delete via WebDAV. Only the delete button in the UI has been implemented earlier than planned originally to do our sponsors a favor. Building this software has been almost 4 years of work for 2 people full-time. Check how much we get in donations. Stop complaining if you wouldn't do the same thing for us. |
As far as the version, our automatic update was not working due to a known Docker bug with DNS servers. Apologies for the confusion on that part. I also understand the hard work you have put into this software, and I am not trying to belittle that. Once I'm at a point where I can comfortably support this software I will gladly do so. This particular issue was one of consistent frustration with other users as seen on Reddit and this issue. I fully support locking features behind subscriber access, in fact I would not be upset if map plotting was also locked. However, as stated by other users, deleting files was a crucial feature that appeared to be ignored. Again, I do apologize for the confusion with the latest edition, I understand how a user complaining about a missing feature that has already been added is frustrating. |
You know my email if you need free support. |
Thanks for sharing this great software! Very easy to setup and use! in case anyone hits this issue, I found this doc page helpful https://docs.photoprism.app/user-guide/organize/delete/ |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Acceptance Criteria:
There should be an option to move a photo to the trash can on deletion.
Use case
Functionality
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: