You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I suggest serving a unified RDF representation describing all the information we have about a treatment in a way that is accessible to all users of our RDF data and which aims for wide compliance with Data on the Web Best Practices.
Differences in the expressed content
One version contains more literal content of the treatment in the form of "InfoItems" the other version contains more explicit information about synonymity.
example
Treatment 03ACBF18FFD61B34FF31FB52FD04ED5B "deprecates" Sadayoshia_acroporae_Macpherson_2010 and defines adayoshia_aludra_Macpherson_2012 according to the lodRdf version:
I can't fid any reference to SpeciesProfileModelhasInformation within the tdwg GitHub organisation, nor anywhere else. @tcatapano, do you have a reference?
In one RDF the objects are literals, in the other resources identified by URIs. What is the range of cito:cites? Potentially the definition of its superptoperty http://purl.org/spar/cito/citesAsAuthority could be helpful.
Currently, we are having two different RDF representations of treatments.
For example for the treatment 03CB87C52324FFE6FCDE9030FA24F97E we provide the following two representations (in RDF Turtle for readability).
The first graph is available when dereferencing http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CB87C52324FFE6FCDE9030FA24F97E with an appropriate accept-header as well when dereferencing http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/lodRdf/03CB87C52324FFE6FCDE9030FA24F97E. The second Graph is available at http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/rdf/03CB87C52324FFE6FCDE9030FA24F97E.
I suggest serving a unified RDF representation describing all the information we have about a treatment in a way that is accessible to all users of our RDF data and which aims for wide compliance with Data on the Web Best Practices.
Differences in the expressed content
One version contains more literal content of the treatment in the form of "InfoItems" the other version contains more explicit information about synonymity.
example
Treatment 03ACBF18FFD61B34FF31FB52FD04ED5B "deprecates" Sadayoshia_acroporae_Macpherson_2010 and defines adayoshia_aludra_Macpherson_2012 according to the lodRdf version:
The other rdf version states in regard to these two names:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: