-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Chapter 3 polish #43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chapter 3 polish #43
Conversation
Ready to merge, if'n you like it. |
Conflicts: book/03-git-branching/1-git-branching.asc
Mostly small changes, though I did move 'Undoing Merges' to Ch7 as I felt it was a little advanced at this point in the narrative. |
For now, let's assume you’ve committed all your changes, so you can switch back to your master branch: | ||
However, before you do that, note that if your working directory or staging area has uncommitted changes that conflict with the branch you're checking out, Git won't let you switch branches. | ||
It's best to have a clean working state when you switch branches. | ||
There are ways to get around this (namely, stashing and commit amending) that we'll cover <<_git_stashing, later>>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a weak preference, but I'm wondering if this is the right way to go. It'll show up as
that we'll cover later.
…in HTML and a digital PDF, but all that linky information will be lost in print. I kind of like using that we'll cover later on, in <<_git_stashing>>.
, because it'll show up as:
that we'll cover later on, in Section 3.2, Stashing.
Like I said, it's a weak preference. If you have a strong opinion either way, I'm cool with it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I like your way better, I'll change it.
Just the one question about naming cross-references; otherwise this looks really good. |
Various edits, and re-exported graphics at 300dpi. Discovered some that were missing, and notated them in #42.