-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Label override for DM file updates #39919
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Label override for DM file updates #39919
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces a label override for DM file updates, allowing structural changes without requiring a CI override. The review focuses on ensuring the correctness of the changes made to the XML files, specifically suggesting the use of condition
instead of feature
where appropriate.
PR #39919: Size comparison from 5dc7824 to e781d14 Full report (11 builds for cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, qpg, stm32, tizen)
|
PR #39919: Size comparison from 5dc7824 to 2f487fb Full report (69 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
This reverts commit e781d14. This was just added as a CI test, don't want these for real in this PR.
PR #39919: Size comparison from 777d399 to 5dbe1b1 Full report (72 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
Summary
I thought I was done making additions to the data model files, but some of the other ones need a fix up, and I don't want to have to keep bugging the TT leads for a CI override. Instead adding a label that indicates the changes to the DM files are structural and not tied to an update of the spec sha or scraper (ex adding an override or additional files from the scraping script)
Related issues
None
Testing
Testing in CI