8000 Is `ftshosts` configuration removed from conveyors? · Issue #7696 · rucio/rucio · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Is ftshosts configuration removed from conveyors? #7696

10000
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
bari12 opened this issue May 2, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7730
Closed

Is ftshosts configuration removed from conveyors? #7696

bari12 opened this issue May 2, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7730
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bari12
Copy link
Member
bari12 commented May 2, 2025

Description

Check, if yes, this should be removed from docs, config, etc.

Steps to reproduce

Rucio Version

No response

Additional Information

No response

@0xquark 0xquark moved this from Todo to In Progress in Rucio 38 “Donkirk” release roadmap May 19, 2025
0xquark added a commit to 0xquark/rucio that referenced this issue May 19, 2025
@0xquark 0xquark moved this from In Progress to In Review in Rucio 38 “Donkirk” release roadmap May 19, 2025
0xquark added a commit to 0xquark/rucio that referenced this issue May 21, 2025
rdimaio pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2025
rdimaio pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2025
@rdimaio rdimaio added this to the 37.3.1 / 37.4.0 milestone May 22, 2025
lobis pushed a commit to lobis/rucio that referenced this issue May 26, 2025
@dchristidis
Copy link
Contributor

Kindly follow this up in the other repositories (minus the probes, where it should remain for the time being).

@rdimaio
Copy link
Contributor
rdimaio commented May 27, 2025

For the documentation repo: related discussion rucio/documentation#565

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants
0