8000 Sort out when 'source' versus 'Source' should be used in ReaR · Issue #3439 · rear/rear · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Sort out when 'source' versus 'Source' should be used in ReaR #3439

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
jsmeix opened this issue Mar 25, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Sort out when 'source' versus 'Source' should be used in ReaR #3439

jsmeix opened this issue Mar 25, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
cleanup documentation enhancement Adaptions and new features no-issue-activity
Milestone
ReaR 999 (future)

Comments

@jsmeix
Copy link
Member
jsmeix commented Mar 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

#3436
revealed that currently it is not clear
when 'source' versus 'Source' should be used in ReaR
so that area needs to be sorted out and cleaned up.
This is a bigger task for the future as time permits.
@jsmeix jsmeix added enhancement Adaptions and new features documentation cleanup labels Mar 25, 2025
@jsmeix jsmeix added this to the ReaR 999 (future) milestone Mar 25, 2025
@jsmeix jsmeix mentioned this issue Mar 25, 2025
Closed
@pcahyna
Copy link
Member
pcahyna commented Mar 25, 2025

I think that the main issue now is whether to use it for library files: #3436 (comment)
8000

gdha added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2025
@gdha
improve the umount_mountpoint function #3439
9955b95
gdha added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2025
@gdha
fix typo in umount_mountpoint function #3439
e3cae70
gdha added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2025
@gdha
#3439 rewrote the umount_mountpoint function
bbd470e
gdha added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2025
@gdha
#3439 update umount_mountpoint function after review/comments
e7f8a2c
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Stale issue message

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cleanup documentation enhancement Adaptions and new features no-issue-activity
Projects
None yet
Milestone
ReaR 999 (future)
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jsmeix @pcahyna
0