8000 TELCOV10N-451 UPD repo CODEOWNERS by mvk · Pull Request #684 · redhatci/ansible-collection-redhatci-ocp · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

8000 TELCOV10N-451 UPD repo CODEOWNERS #684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mvk
Copy link
Contributor 8000
@mvk mvk commented May 21, 2025
  • set @redhatci/verification team to maintain its code
SUMMARY

adding the existing + future roles paths to be owned by the team @redhatci/verification

Updates TELCOV10N-451

ISSUE TYPE
  • Updates code review access via CODEOWNERS
Tests

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator
dcibot commented May 21, 2025

from change #684:

  • no check (not a code change)

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented May 21, 2025
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CODEOWNERS file was updated to assign the @redhatci/verification team as owners of the /roles/junit2json and /roles/test_report_send paths. No other changes or modifications to ownership were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Added /roles/junit2json and /roles/test_report_send to @redhatci/verification ownership.

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 30th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28f35cd and a7659dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Ansible-lint Check
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.17)
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.9)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator
dcibot commented May 21, 2025

from change #684:

  • no check (not a code change)

@mvk mvk marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2025 12:45
@mvk mvk requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2025 12:45
- set `@redhatci/verification` team to maintain its code

Signed-off-by: Maxim Kovgan <makovgan@redhat.com>
@mvk mvk force-pushed the mvk-codeowners-upd branch from 28f35cd to a7659dc Compare May 21, 2025 12:47
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator
dcibot commented May 21, 2025

from change #684:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator
dcibot commented May 21, 2025

from change #684:

  • no check (not a code change)

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

42-43: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Nice catch! Adding new role paths for verification
These lines correctly assign ownership of /roles/junit2json and /roles/test_report_send to @redhatci/verification. Let’s just double-check that those directories actually exist in the repo.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the new role directories exist
find roles -maxdepth 1 -type d -name 'junit2json'
find roles -maxdepth 1 -type d -name 'test_report_send'

Length of output: 122


Missing test_report_send directory in CODEOWNERS
It looks like:

  • roles/junit2json exists
  • roles/test_report_send was not found

Please confirm the correct path or create the directory before assigning ownership. For example:

- /roles/test_report_send              @redhatci/verification
+ /roles/<correct_directory_name>      @redhatci/verification

Or add the missing roles/test_report_send folder to the repo.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In the .github/CODEOWNERS file at lines 42 to 43, the path
/roles/test_report_send is assigned ownership but the directory does not exist
in the repository. To fix this, either create the missing roles/test_report_send
directory in the repo or update the CODEOWNERS file to remove or correct the
path to an existing directory before assigning ownership.

Copy link

@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@

# verification team
/roles/jenkins_job_launcher @redhatci/verification
/roles/junit2json @redhatci/verification
/roles/test_report_send @redhatci/verification
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this role doesn't exist afaict

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true, I split this relatively harmless piece into a separate PR,
This does not break anything, just a forward compatible patching.
(#682)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0