8000 VTO buffer and keepalive fix by urbim · Pull Request #301 · rroller/dahua · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

VTO buffer and keepalive fix #301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 9, 2023

Conversation

urbim
Copy link
Contributor
@urbim urbim commented Sep 9, 2023

I had some issues running this integration with DHI-VTO3311Q-WP. After some time, the integration stopped working and I had to restart homeassistant to fix it.

After some debugging, it turns out that asyncio does not forward the entire message to the data_received function if the message is too large. In turn this sometimes messes up the future messages and the integration stops working. To remedy that, I added a buffer to the data_received function.

During debugging I also noticed that data_handlers is growing due to keep_alive handlers being added constantly. To fix that I added code to remove the handler after response from keep-alive has been received. I don't think this has anything to do with the above issue, however I still think it should be fixed.

And for the last change - I added DHI-VTO3311Q-WP to the list of supported devices, since I had no further issues running the integration with the above fixes.

@rroller
Copy link
Owner
rroller commented Sep 9, 2023

Thank you! Merging, releasing, and testing it. Yes I should test then release, but I don't have my local HA setup currently :-)

@rroller rroller merged commit b71573d into rroller:main Sep 9, 2023
@rroller
Copy link
Owner
rroller commented Sep 9, 2023

https://github.com/rroller/dahua/releases/tag/0.9.48

@urbim urbim deleted the fix/vto-buffer-and-keepalive-fix branch September 9, 2023 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0