8000 Light client input validation (IBC Hooks + IBC contracts) by assafmo · Pull Request #1441 · scrtlabs/SecretNetwork · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Light client input validation (IBC Hooks + IBC contracts) #1441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023

Conversation

assafmo
Copy link
Contributor
@assafmo assafmo commented May 16, 2023

This PR adds light client input validation for the following use cases:

  • MsgRecvPacket to IBC-enabled contracts
  • MsgAcknowledge to IBC-enabled contracts
  • MsgTimeout to IBC-enabled contracts
  • ibc-hooks incoming transfer
  • ibc-hooks outgoing transfer ack
  • ibc-hooks outgoing transfer timeout

@assafmo assafmo marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2023 22:06
@assafmo assafmo requested a review from Cashmaney May 31, 2023 06:13
@assafmo assafmo changed the title More light client input validation Light client input validation (IBC Hooks + IBC contracts) Jun 5, 2023
Base automatically changed from ibc-hooks to master June 5, 2023 09:40
@assafmo assafmo merged commit 9825f57 into master Jun 5, 2023
@assafmo assafmo deleted the ibc-input-light-client-validation branch June 5, 2023 09:41
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
MasterNodeKeyId = "NodeExchMasterKey"
MasterIoKeyId = "IoExchMasterKey"
SecretNodeSeedLegacyConfig = "seed.json"
SecretNodeSeedNewConfig = "new_seed.json"
SecretNodeSeedNewConfig = "new_seed.json" //nolint:gosec

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Hard-coded credentials

Hard-coded [secret](1).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0