8000 Benchmark using the cache for a few misses by seddonym · Pull Request #199 · seddonym/grimp · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Benchmark using the cache for a few misses #199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025
Merged

Benchmark using the cache for a few misses #199

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

seddonym
Copy link
Owner
@seddonym seddonym commented Apr 4, 2025

It's useful to distinguish this scenario from the others, as it's a common situation which we should make sure we optimize for.

@seddonym
Benchmark using the cache for a few misses
b4504ce 
It's useful to distinguish this scenario from the others, as it's a
common situation which we should make sure we optimize for.
@codspeed-hq CodSpeed HQ
Copy link
codspeed-hq bot 8000 commented Apr 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #199 will not alter performance

Comparing add-benchmark-for-mostly-cached (b4504ce) with master (a311e6c)

Summary

✅ 18 untouched benchmarks
🆕 3 new benchmarks
⁉️ 1 (👁 1) dropped benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
👁 test_build_django_from_cache 136.2 ms N/A N/A
🆕 test_build_django_from_cache_a_few_misses[15] N/A 136.4 ms N/A
🆕 test_build_django_from_cache_a_few_misses[2] N/A 135.5 ms N/A
🆕 test_build_django_from_cache_no_misses N/A 135.4 ms N/A

@seddonym seddonym merged commit a318714 into master Apr 4, 2025
18 checks passed
Peter554
Peter554 reviewed Apr 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Peter554 Peter554 Peter554 left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@seddonym @Peter554
0