-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #836 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 57.36% 57.36%
=======================================
Files 214 214
Lines 14825 14825
=======================================
Hits 8504 8504
Misses 5707 5707
Partials 614 614 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
|
||
We will also supply an edited configuration for the `dydx_migration_api` which facilitates graceful migration from dydx's `x/prices` to `x/marketmap`. | ||
|
||
For the `dydx_migration_api` provider, **make sure to fill in the URL for the REST endpoint and gRPC endpoint of your node** (in that order). The migration API will _not_ work unless the REST API endpoint is the **first** endpoint in the endpoints list. | ||
|
||
```json oracle.json | ||
{ | ||
"providers": { | ||
"dydx_migration_api": { | ||
"api": { | ||
"endpoints": [ | ||
{ | ||
"url": "http://<YOUR NODE REST API ENDPOINT>" | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"url": "<YOUR NODE GRPC ENDPOINT>:<YOUR NODE GRPC PORT>" | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
given that v6 uses x/marketmap, i don't think users going from v6 -> v7 need to do this migration stuff anymore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I just wanted to keep the doc the same as people were running for dydx to keep the change that validators see as minimal as possible
closes CON-1966
wanted to keep the doc the same as people were running for dydx to keep the change that validators see as minimal as possible