8000 JP-3856: Style Updates for Charge Migration by kmacdonald-stsci · Pull Request #9162 · spacetelescope/jwst · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

JP-3856: Style Updates for Charge Migration #9162

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

kmacdonald-stsci
Copy link
Contributor
@kmacdonald-stsci kmacdonald-stsci commented Feb 10, 2025

Resolves JP-3855
Resolves JP-3856

This PR addresses code style changes for the charge migration step.

Tasks

  • request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
  • add a build milestone, i.e. Build 11.3 (use the latest build if not sure)
  • Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
    • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
    • update or add relevant tests
    • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
    • start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
      • Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
        • after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
  • if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly
news fragment change types...
  • changes/<PR#>.general.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change
  • changes/<PR#>.docs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.stpipe.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.datamodels.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.scripts.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.set_telescope_pointing.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.pipeline.rst

stage 1

  • changes/<PR#>.group_scale.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.dq_init.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.emicorr.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.saturation.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.ipc.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.firstframe.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.lastframe.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.reset.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.superbias.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.refpix.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.linearity.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.rscd.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.persistence.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.dark_current.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.charge_migration.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.jump.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.clean_flicker_noise.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.ramp_fitting.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.gain_scale.rst

stage 2

  • changes/<PR#>.assign_wcs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.badpix_selfcal.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.msaflagopen.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.nsclean.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.imprint.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.background.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.extract_2d.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.master_background.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.wavecorr.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.srctype.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.straylight.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.wfss_contam.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.flatfield.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.fringe.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.pathloss.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.barshadow.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.photom.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.pixel_replace.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.resample_spec.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.residual_fringe.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.cube_build.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.extract_1d.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.resample.rst

stage 3

  • changes/<PR#>.assign_mtwcs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.mrs_imatch.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.tweakreg.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.skymatch.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.exp_to_source.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.outlier_detection.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.tso_photometry.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.stack_refs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.align_refs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.klip.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.spectral_leak.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.source_catalog.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.combine_1d.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.ami.rst

other

  • changes/<PR#>.wfs_combine.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.white_light.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.cube_skymatch.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.engdb_tools.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.guider_cds.rst

Copy link
codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.80%. Comparing base (0e0ecf3) to head (c974c14).
Report is 810 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
jwst/charge_migration/charge_migration_step.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9162      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.81%   73.80%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         372      372              
  Lines       37271    37274       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        27510    27510              
- Misses       9761     9764       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator
@emolter emolter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melanieclarke melanieclarke added this to the Build 11.3 milestone Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator
@melanieclarke melanieclarke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One quick suggestion for clarity. Otherwise, looks good pending conflict resolution and passing regtests.

@kmacdonald-stsci
Copy link
Contributor Author

@melanieclarke
Copy link
Collaborator

Regtests look fine, conflict still needs resolving.

Copy link
Collaborator
@melanieclarke melanieclarke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I think this looks right now!

@melanieclarke melanieclarke merged commit d8033b3 into spacetelescope:main Feb 11, 2025
30 checks passed
@kmacdonald-stsci kmacdonald-stsci deleted the jp_3856_charge_migration branch February 13, 2025 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0