8000 Monitor node losses across training by gitttt-1234 · Pull Request #199 · talmolab/sleap-nn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Monitor node losses across training #199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Monitor node losses across training #199

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

gitttt-1234
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 added the slumbr Multi-head model label May 12, 2025
@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 changed the base branch from main to divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding May 12, 2025 22:32
@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 changed the base branch from divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding to divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding_centroid_multihead May 12, 2025 22:32
@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 changed the base branch from divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding_centroid_multihead to divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding May 12, 2025 22:33
@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 changed the base branch from divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding to divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding_centroid_multihead May 12, 2025 22:33
@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 force-pushed the divya/slumbr_v1_centered_node_losses branch from 003d77c to be37b54 Compare May 16, 2025 21:25
@gitttt-1234 gitttt-1234 changed the base branch from divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding_centroid_multihead to divya/slumbr_v1_center_padding May 16, 2025 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
slumbr Multi-head model
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@gitttt-1234
0