8000 fix(ci): failing docker builds by outerlook · Pull Request #710 · trufnetwork/node · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

fix(ci): failing docker builds #710

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

fix(ci): failing docker builds #710

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

outerlook
Copy link
Contributor
@outerlook outerlook commented Nov 8, 2024

Description

Our task file sources parameters were apparently incorrect, pointing to output instead of real sources to cache.

This lead to previous dockerfile build caching not working as expected.

The failing step was just to catch when something on previous step was wrong.

It started unrelated to our changes, probably introduced by upstream changes (maybe the taskfile github action was updated?).

  • Added .task directory to both .dockerignore and .gitignore files
  • Added /gitignore to .gitignore
  • Fixed Taskfile.yml source paths for binary download tasks:
    • Updated kwil-binaries task to use ./scripts/download-binaries.sh as source
    • Updated kwil-binaries-dev task to use ./scripts/download-binaries-dev.sh as source

Related Problem

How Has This Been Tested?

  • verified locally with act

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated .dockerignore to ignore .task files during Docker builds.
    • Modified .gitignore to include new entries for /gitignore and .task, and improved organization by adding a newline for deployments/network.
    • Revised Taskfile.yml to clarify binary download sources for kwil-binaries and kwil-binaries-dev, ensuring proper YAML formatting.

Added `.task` to .dockerignore and .gitignore. Corrected the sources for `download-binaries.sh` and `download-binaries-dev.sh` tasks in Taskfile.yml to ensure proper tracking and task execution.
Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to three files: .dockerignore, .gitignore, and Taskfile.yml. The .dockerignore file now includes a new entry to ignore files matching the .task pattern. The .gitignore file has new entries for ignoring the deployments/network directory and .task, along with a comment for clarity. Lastly, the Taskfile.yml has updated source paths for tasks related to downloading binaries, correcting indentation for proper YAML formatting.

Changes

File Change Summary
.dockerignore Added entry: .task.
.gitignore Added entries: /gitignore, .task. Updated entry: deployments/network (newline added).
Taskfile.yml Updated task sources for kwil-binaries and kwil-binaries-dev to point to download scripts. Corrected indentation for compose-dev task.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Address CI failures related to acceptance tests (#709) The changes do not address CI issues directly.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where code does play,
New entries sprout, brightening the day.
With .task and scripts, we tidy our space,
Ignoring the clutter, we quicken our pace.
Hopping through changes, we cheer and we sway! 🌼

Warning

Tool Failures:

Tool Failure Count:


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@outerlook outerlook requested a review from MicBun November 8, 2024 13:09
@outerlook outerlook self-assigned this Nov 8, 2024
8000
Copy link
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Taskfile.yml (1)

103-113: Consider enhancing error handling and logging for binary downloads.

While the source path changes fix the caching issues, consider these improvements for better maintainability:

  1. Add error checks in the download scripts to verify successful downloads
  2. Add logging to track download progress and cache hits/misses
  3. Consider implementing a checksum verification step for downloaded binaries
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45286ff and c3d1f23.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • Taskfile.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .dockerignore
  • .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Taskfile.yml (2)

112-112: LGTM! Consistent source path update for dev binaries.

The change maintains consistency with the previous fix and properly handles caching for development binaries.

Let's verify the dev script exists and is executable:

✅ Verification successful

Since the script exists and is executable as verified by the shell script output, I can generate the final response:

Verified: Development binary download script is properly configured

The ./scripts/download-binaries-dev.sh script exists and has the correct executable permissions, confirming that the source path update in the kwil-binaries-dev task is valid and functional.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the download script exists and is executable
if [[ -x "./scripts/download-binaries-dev.sh" ]]; then
    echo "Script exists and is executable"
else
    echo "WARNING: Script not found or not executable"
fi

Length of output: 118


104-104: LGTM! Correct source path for proper caching.

The change from watching build output to watching the source script is the right approach for proper cache invalidation.

Let's verify the script exists and is executable:

✅ Verification successful

Since the script exists and is executable as verified by the shell script output, I can now generate the final response.

✓ Verified: Script path and permissions are correct

The ./scripts/download-binaries.sh script exists and has proper executable permissions, confirming that the Taskfile's source path update is valid and will work as intended for proper cache invalidation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the download script exists and is executable
if [[ -x "./scripts/download-binaries.sh" ]]; then
    echo "Script exists and is executable"
else
    echo "WARNING: Script not found or not executable"
fi

Length of output: 114

@MicBun MicBun merged commit 012f803 into main Nov 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@MicBun MicBun deleted the fix/ci-acceptance branch November 8, 2024 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Problem: failing CI for acceptance tests
2 participants
0