✨ Add full output plotting option to PROCESS class
#3673
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3673 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 37.63% 37.76% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 87 87
Lines 21892 21899 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 8238 8271 +33
+ Misses 13654 13628 -26 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
PROCESS class
clmould
requested changes
May 29, 2025
1c6ff2f to
1f5f9c4
Compare
Co-authored-by: clmould <86794332+clmould@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: clmould <86794332+clmould@users.noreply.github.com>
1f5f9c4 to
8edaa8f
Compare
clmould
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2025
OceanNuclear
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2025
* ✨ Add full output plotting option to Process class * 📝 Update documentation for plotting and running PROCESS with full output option * 📝 Update VS Code documentation and modify integration test to use full output option * Update documentation/proc-pages/usage/plotting.md Co-authored-by: clmould <86794332+clmould@users.noreply.github.com> * Update documentation/proc-pages/usage/plotting.md Co-authored-by: clmould <86794332+clmould@users.noreply.github.com> * 📝 Refactor output path handling in plotting scripts for clarity and consistency --------- Co-authored-by: clmould <86794332+clmould@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request focuses on improving documentation and enhancing the functionality of the
PROCESStool by introducing a new--full-outputflag for automated summary plotting. Key changes include updates to documentation, the addition of the new flag, and the removal of outdated functionality.Documentation Improvements:
<h2>and<h3>tags with Markdown-style headers for consistency (##and###).--full-outputflag to the "Running PROCESS" documentation, including examples of its usage and the output it generates.--full-outputflag.Code Enhancements:
--full-outputflag inprocess/main.pyto automate the generation of summary plots (e.g., radial build, Sankey diagrams) after aPROCESSrun.post_processmethod to handle the new--full-outputflag, running all relevant plotting scripts (plot_proc,plot_radial_build,plot_sankey).Code Cleanup:
--plotargument and its associated logic fromprocess/main.pyto streamline the codebase.--plotargument and to test the--full-outputflag instead.These changes improve both the usability of the
PROCESStool and the clarity of its documentation.Checklist
I confirm that I have completed the following checks: