8000 🔄 Add naming convention for strains in style guide by chris-ashe · Pull Request #3707 · ukaea/PROCESS · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

🔄 Add naming convention for strains in style guide #3707

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chris-ashe
Copy link
Collaborator
@chris-ashe chris-ashe commented Jul 4, 2025

This pull request updates the documentation standards in documentation/proc-pages/development/standards.md to include naming conventions for strains.

Documentation updates:

  • Added a new section specifying that strain identifiers should start with the str_ prefix.

Checklist

I confirm that I have completed the following checks:

  • My changes follow the PROCESS style guide
  • I have justified any large differences in the regression tests caused by this pull request in the comments.
  • I have added new tests where appropriate for the changes I have made.
  • If I have had to change any existing unit or integration tests, I have justified this change in the pull request comments.
  • If I have made documentation changes, I have checked they render correctly.
  • I have added documentation for my change, if appropriate.

@chris-ashe chris-ashe self-assigned this Jul 4, 2025
@chris-ashe chris-ashe added the Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 4, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.73%. Comparing base (515f8c3) to head (1d414d1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3707   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.73%   37.73%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines       22761    22761           
=======================================
  Hits         8588     8588           
  Misses      14173    14173           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@chris-ashe chris-ashe requested a review from j-a-foster July 4, 2025 09:46
@chris-ashe chris-ashe marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2025 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0