Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request primarily focuses on improving the clarity and consistency of variable naming in documentation and example data files related to neutral beam injection (NBI) models. It also introduces a detailed explanation of the beam tangency radius calculation and updates associated constraints.
Documentation updates:
Variable renaming for clarity:
frbeam
tof_radius_beam_tangency_rmajor
inculham_nb.md
to better describe its purpose as the ratio of beam tangency radius to plasma major radius. This change is consistently applied across equations and descriptions. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]Beam tangency radius explanation:
radius_beam_tangency_max
) innbi_overview.md
. This includes geometric considerations and constraints based on TF coil dimensions.Example data files updates:
beamwd
todx_beam_duct
in multiple example data files to align with the updated naming convention for the width of the neutral beam duct.These changes improve the readability and consistency of the documentation and example data files, making it easier for users to understand and work with the NBI models.
Checklist
I confirm that I have completed the following checks: