-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
fix: unexpected null pointer exception due to race condition #243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: JounQin <admin@1stg.me>
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: e9027a8 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes an unexpected null pointer exception due to a race condition in the worker thread message processing. Key changes include:
- Adjusting the message retrieval logic in src/index.ts to properly handle race conditions.
- Adding a new worker file (test/worker-identity.js) and a high-volume reliability test (test/reliability.spec.ts) to validate behavior.
- Updating package.json configuration regarding ignored files.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
File | Description |
---|---|
test/worker-identity.js | Adds a simple worker function using runAsWorker to echo the input value. |
test/reliability.spec.ts | Introduces a high-volume test to validate worker reliability, conditionally run on CI. |
src/index.ts | Refactors message retrieval to mitigate the race condition causing null pointer exceptions. |
package.json | Updates the ignoreFiles property from "**/*.d.ts" to "lib". |
.changeset/shiny-kids-check.md | Records the patch bump and fix description. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
package.json:139
- Please confirm that changing the ignored files from "**/*.d.ts" to "lib" is intentional and does not exclude required type definition files from processes like linting or publishing.
"lib"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to e9027a8 in 2 minutes and 0 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
91
lines of code in5
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6
draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .changeset/shiny-kids-check.md:2
- Draft comment:
Ensure the changeset key formatting (quotes around "synckit") is intentional; typically keys are unquoted. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%
<= threshold50%
None
2. package.json:138
- Draft comment:
Verify that changing 'ignoreFiles' from "**/*.d.ts" to "lib" is deliberate and meets your type-coverage goals. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%
<= threshold50%
The comment is asking the PR author to verify their intention behind changing theignoreFiles
pattern. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or to ensure the behavior is intended. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
3. src/index.ts:545
- Draft comment:
The new logic to check for a valid message (using msg?.id and recursive calls) addresses the race condition. Consider consolidating the redundant id-checks to simplify the control flow and avoid deep recursion in edge cases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
4. test/reliability.spec.ts:5
- Draft comment:
The test loop runs 1e6 iterations. Since it is gated by the CI flag, ensure this high iteration count is acceptable and doesn’t impact CI performance. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%
<= threshold50%
None
5. test/worker-identity.js:1
- Draft comment:
The worker identity implementation is minimal and clear. No issues detected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
<= threshold50%
None
6. test/reliability.spec.ts:18
- Draft comment:
Typographical note: The log message in this line readsFailed on ${index + 1}/${times} run.
. Consider revising it to use plural form (e.g.runs
) for consistency, since the number of runs is greater than one. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a very minor grammatical suggestion about an error message that will only show up if the test fails. While technically correct (since times=1e6 means multiple runs), this kind of minor wording change in an error message doesn't impact functionality. According to the rules, we should not make purely informative comments or comments that are unimportant. The inconsistency between "runs" in the test title and "run" in the error message could be confusing to users seeing the error. Maybe consistency in terminology is more important than I think? While consistency is good, this is still an extremely minor issue in an error message. The meaning is perfectly clear either way, and this doesn't warrant a PR comment. Delete this comment as it's too minor and doesn't require a code change. Error message wording that doesn't impact functionality shouldn't be nitpicked in PR comments.
Workflow ID: wflow_3KA8Xc2pngPlmIoH
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 0.9.x #243 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 100.00% 98.65% -1.35%
===========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 218 223 +5
Branches 105 108 +3
===========================================
+ Hits 218 220 +2
- Misses 0 3 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
commit: |
related #217
Important
Fix null pointer exception in
receiveMessageWithId
and add reliability test forcreateSyncFn
.receiveMessageWithId
insrc/index.ts
by handling undefined messages.reliability.spec.ts
to testcreateSyncFn
over 1 million iterations.worker-identity.js
as a worker script for testing.package.json
to ignorelib
directory in type coverage.This description was created by
for e9027a8. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.