8000 fix: unexpected null pointer exception due to race condition by JounQin · Pull Request #243 · un-ts/synckit · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

fix: unexpected null pointer exception due to race condition #243

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

JounQin
Copy link
Member
@JounQin JounQin commented May 30, 2025

related #217


Important

Fix null pointer exception in receiveMessageWithId and add reliability test for createSyncFn.

  • Bug Fix:
    • Fix null pointer exception in receiveMessageWithId in src/index.ts by handling undefined messages.
  • Testing:
    • Add reliability.spec.ts to test createSyncFn over 1 million iterations.
    • Add worker-identity.js as a worker script for testing.
  • Configuration:
    • Update package.json to ignore lib directory in type coverage.

This description was created by Ellipsis for e9027a8. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@JounQin JounQin requested a review from Copilot May 30, 2025 02:40
@JounQin JounQin self-assigned this May 30, 2025
@JounQin JounQin added the bug Something isn't working label May 30, 2025
Copy link
changeset-bot bot commented May 30, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: e9027a8

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
synckit Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented May 30, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Copy link

Copy link
@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes an unexpected null pointer exception due to a race condition in the worker thread message processing. Key changes include:

  • Adjusting the message retrieval logic in src/index.ts to properly handle race conditions.
  • Adding a new worker file (test/worker-identity.js) and a high-volume reliability test (test/reliability.spec.ts) to validate behavior.
  • Updating package.json configuration regarding ignored files.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
test/worker-identity.js Adds a simple worker function using runAsWorker to echo the input value.
test/reliability.spec.ts Introduces a high-volume test to validate worker reliability, conditionally run on CI.
src/index.ts Refactors message retrieval to mitigate the race condition causing null pointer exceptions.
package.json Updates the ignoreFiles property from "**/*.d.ts" to "lib".
.changeset/shiny-kids-check.md Records the patch bump and fix description.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

package.json:139

  • Please confirm that changing the ignored files from "**/*.d.ts" to "lib" is intentional and does not exclude required type definition files from processes like linting or publishing.
"lib"

Copy link
@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to e9027a8 in 2 minutes and 0 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 91 lines of code in 5 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 6 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .changeset/shiny-kids-check.md:2
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure the changeset key formatting (quotes around "synckit") is intentional; typically keys are unquoted.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
2. package.json:138
  • Draft comment:
    Verify that changing 'ignoreFiles' from "**/*.d.ts" to "lib" is deliberate and meets your type-coverage goals.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to verify their intention behind changing the ignoreFiles pattern. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or to ensure the behavior is intended. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
3. src/index.ts:545
  • Draft comment:
    The new logic to check for a valid message (using msg?.id and recursive calls) addresses the race condition. Consider consolidating the redundant id-checks to simplify the control flow and avoid deep recursion in edge cases.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment looked like it was already resolved.
4. test/reliability.spec.ts:5
  • Draft comment:
    The test loop runs 1e6 iterations. Since it is gated by the CI flag, ensure this high iteration count is acceptable and doesn’t impact CI performance.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
5. test/worker-identity.js:1
  • Draft comment:
    The worker identity implementation is minimal and clear. No issues detected.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
6. test/reliability.spec.ts:18
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical note: The log message in this line reads Failed on ${index + 1}/${times} run.. Consider revising it to use plural form (e.g. runs) for consistency, since the number of runs is greater than one.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a very minor grammatical suggestion about an error message that will only show up if the test fails. While technically correct (since times=1e6 means multiple runs), this kind of minor wording change in an error message doesn't impact functionality. According to the rules, we should not make purely informative comments or comments that are unimportant. The inconsistency between "runs" in the test title and "run" in the error message could be confusing to users seeing the error. Maybe consistency in terminology is more important than I think? While consistency is good, this is still an extremely minor issue in an error message. The meaning is perfectly clear either way, and this doesn't warrant a PR comment. Delete this comment as it's too minor and doesn't require a code change. Error message wording that doesn't impact functionality shouldn't be nitpicked in PR comments.

Workflow ID: wflow_3KA8Xc2pngPlmIoH

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link
codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.65%. Comparing base (197effc) to head (e9027a8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 0.9.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             0.9.x     #243      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   98.65%   -1.35%     
===========================================
  Files            1        1              
  Lines          218      223       +5     
  Branches       105      108       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits           218      220       +2     
- Misses           0        3       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@JounQin JounQin merged commit 5147bd2 into 0.9.x May 30, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the fix/message branch May 30, 2025 03:01
@JounQin JounQin mentioned this pull request May 30, 2025
Copy link
pkg-pr-new bot commented May 30, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/un-ts/synckit@243

commit: ad8572b

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0