8000 fix: Fix problem with setting range of auto-generated widget by Czaki · Pull Request #1187 · 4DNucleome/PartSeg · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

fix: Fix problem with setting range of auto-generated widget #1187

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

Czaki
Copy link
Collaborator
@Czaki Czaki commented Sep 3, 2024

fix PARTSEG-WH
fix PARTSEG-WG

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the robustness of the drawing logic to prevent potential errors related to widget access.
  • Enhancements

    • Updated the assignment of the range attribute to ensure it consistently holds a tuple of the expected type.
    • Changed the type constraints for minimum_border_distance to enforce integer values, enhancing input validation.

@Czaki Czaki added this to the 0.15.4 milestone Sep 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor
sourcery-ai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


Tips
  • Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
  • You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
    • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
    • Change the review language;
  • You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

Copy link
Contributor
@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've reviewed this pull request using the Sourcery rules engine. If you would also like our AI-powered code review then let us know.

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve modifications to several Python files, enhancing code robustness and type handling. Key updates include improved condition checks in event handling, adjustments to how a range attribute is assigned to ensure consistent data types, and the enforcement of integer constraints for a parameter in a class. These changes aim to prevent potential errors and ensure data integrity across the application.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
package/PartSeg/common_gui/algorithms_description.py Expanded condition in paintEvent method to ensure safe access to self.widgets_dict, preventing key errors.
package/PartSegCore/algorithm_describe_base.py Modified __init__ method to assign self.range as a tuple of values cast to self.value_type, improving type consistency.
package/PartSegCore/segmentation/threshold.py Changed type constraints for minimum_border_distance from floating-point to integer values, enforcing whole number inputs.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Algorithm
    participant WidgetDict

    User->>Algorithm: Trigger paintEvent
    Algorithm->>WidgetDict: Check if name exists
    alt Name exists
        WidgetDict-->>Algorithm: Return widget
        Algorithm->>User: Render widget
    else Name does not exist
        Algorithm->>User: Handle error
    end
Loading

🐰 In a world of code so bright,
Changes make things feel just right.
With checks and types all set to play,
Bugs and errors kept at bay!
Let's hop along, with joy we cheer,
For smoother paths, the code is clear!
🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a66801 and 3af5133.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • package/PartSeg/common_gui/algorithms_description.py (1 hunks)
  • package/PartSegCore/algorithm_describe_base.py (1 hunks)
  • package/PartSegCore/segmentation/threshold.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
package/PartSegCore/segmentation/threshold.py (1)

416-417: LGTM!

The code changes are approved for the following reasons:

  • The change enforces the minimum_border_distance field to be an integer instead of a float, which is consistent with the type hint int.
  • The change does not affect the functionality as the value is already assigned as an integer 10.
  • The change improves type consistency and avoids potential type mismatch issues.
package/PartSegCore/algorithm_describe_base.py (1)

87-87: LGTM!

The code change is approved. It enhances the robustness of the code by ensuring that self.range consistently holds a tuple of values of the expected type, rather than potentially holding a raw list or other structure.

package/PartSeg/common_gui/algorithms_description.py (1)

602-607: LGTM!

The code changes enhance the robustness of the paintEvent method by adding an additional check to ensure that the current widget (identified by name) exists within self.widgets_dict. This prevents potential key errors when accessing self.widgets_dict.

@Czaki Czaki changed the title fix: Fix problem with setting range of autogenerated widget fix: Fix problem with setting range of auto-generated widget Sep 3, 2024
Copy link
sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Copy link
codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.06%. Comparing base (a763466) to head (7d2b5b1).
Report is 32 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ckage/PartSeg/common_gui/algorithms_description.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1187   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.06%   93.06%           
========================================
  Files          209      209           
  Lines        32897    32897           
========================================
  Hits         30614    30614           
  Misses        2283     2283           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Czaki Czaki merged commit 9246402 into develop Sep 4, 2024
52 of 53 checks passed
@Czaki Czaki deleted the fix_code_distance branch September 4, 2024 06:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0