-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
chore: Try to fix Upgrade dependencies workflow #1264
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The documentation sugest that ssh key is no longe needed.
Reviewer's GuideThis pull request attempts to fix the 'Upgrade dependencies' workflow by commenting out the File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe update modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- Consider removing the commented-out code block instead of leaving it in the file.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml (1)
19-22
: Remove outdated SSH key configuration and clean up commented blockThe
ssh-key
parameter is no longer required withactions/checkout@v4
when using a PAT or the defaultGITHUB_TOKEN
. Removing this block simplifies the workflow:
- Verify that the default
GITHUB_TOKEN
or the providedGHA_TOKEN
has the necessary permissions to clone and push toauto-dependency-upgrades
.- Test the scheduled run to ensure the PR is still created successfully.
- Delete lines 19–22 instead of leaving them commented to keep the YAML file clean and maintainable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms (28)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_other test windows)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_linux test_linux)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_other test macos)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller windows)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller macos_arm)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds sdist)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller macos)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller_linux)
- GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / macos-13 py 3.11 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Base py3.9 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.9 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.10 latest PyQt5 _pydantic_1
- GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt6
- GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 latest PySide6
- GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.10 latest PySide2
- GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / windows-latest py 3.11 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / macos-14 py 3.12 latest PyQt6
- GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.11 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Test PartSeg minimal / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.9 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: test_coverage / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt5
- GitHub Check: Test PartSeg conda
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Documentation_check help)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Documentation_check Notebook_check)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (manifest_check manifest_check)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (GetTestData linux)
- GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (formatting_check check_formating)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
The documentation suggests that ssh key is no longe needed.
Summary by Sourcery
Remove SSH key configuration from the dependency upgrade workflow
CI:
Chores:
Summary by CodeRabbit