8000 chore: Try to fix Upgrade dependencies workflow by Czaki · Pull Request #1264 · 4DNucleome/PartSeg · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

chore: Try to fix Upgrade dependencies workflow #1264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Czaki
Copy link
Collaborator
@Czaki Czaki commented May 4, 2025

The documentation suggests that ssh key is no longe needed.

Summary by Sourcery

Remove SSH key configuration from the dependency upgrade workflow

CI:

  • Updated upgrade-dependencies.yml workflow to remove SSH key settings

Chores:

  • Commented out SSH key configuration in the GitHub Actions workflow

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow configuration by disabling the use of a deployment SSH key in the dependency upgrade process. No changes to workflow functionality.

The documentation sugest that ssh key is no longe needed.
@Czaki Czaki added this to the 0.16.2 milestone May 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor
sourcery-ai bot commented May 4, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This pull request attempts to fix the 'Upgrade dependencies' workflow by commenting out the ssh-key parameter previously passed to the actions/checkout step, based on documentation suggesting it is no longer necessary.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removed SSH key configuration from checkout action
  • Commented out the with block containing the ssh-key parameter for the actions/checkout@v4 step.
.github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented May 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The update modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file .github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml by commenting out the with block for the actions/checkout@v4 step. This block previously included the ssh-key parameter that referenced a secret named DEPLOY_KEY. No other changes are made to the workflow or its logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml Commented out the with block containing the ssh-key parameter for the actions/checkout@v4 step. No other modifications.

Poem

A whisk of a paw, a hop in the flow,
The secret key’s hidden, now resting below.
No more with-block in checkout’s domain,
The workflow continues, simple and plain.
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai ga 8000 ther interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • Consider removing the commented-out code block instead of leaving it in the file.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
sonarqubecloud bot commented May 4, 2025

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml (1)

19-22: Remove outdated SSH key configuration and clean up commented block

The ssh-key parameter is no longer required with actions/checkout@v4 when using a PAT or the default GITHUB_TOKEN. Removing this block simplifies the workflow:

  • Verify that the default GITHUB_TOKEN or the provided GHA_TOKEN has the necessary permissions to clone and push to auto-dependency-upgrades.
  • Test the scheduled run to ensure the PR is still created successfully.
  • Delete lines 19–22 instead of leaving them commented to keep the YAML file clean and maintainable.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ec6db6 and 5c2c566.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms (28)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_other test windows)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_linux test_linux)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_other test macos)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller windows)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller macos_arm)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds sdist)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller macos)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller_linux)
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / macos-13 py 3.11 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.9 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.9 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.10 latest PyQt5 _pydantic_1
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt6
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 latest PySide6
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.10 latest PySide2
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / windows-latest py 3.11 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / macos-14 py 3.12 latest PyQt6
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.11 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Test PartSeg minimal / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.9 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: test_coverage / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Test PartSeg conda
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Documentation_check help)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Documentation_check Notebook_check)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (manifest_check manifest_check)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (GetTestData linux)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (formatting_check check_formating)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

@Czaki Czaki merged commit 96f8681 into develop May 4, 2025
59 checks passed
@Czaki Czaki deleted the fix_dep_workflow branch May 4, 2025 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0