8000 chore: block `sentry==3.0.0a1` for pre-tests by Czaki · Pull Request #1272 · 4DNucleome/PartSeg · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

chore: block sentry==3.0.0a1 for pre-tests #1272

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025
Merged

chore: block sentry==3.0.0a1 for pre-tests #1272

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

Czaki
Copy link
Collaborator
@Czaki Czaki commented May 13, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

  • Add sentry==3.0.0a1 to requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt to block it in pre-tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated requirements to exclude a problematic version of a package, ensuring improved stability during installation.

@Czaki Czaki added this to the 0.16.3 milestone May 13, 2025
@sourcery-ai Sourcery AI
Copy link
Contributor
sourcery-ai bot commented May 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Reviewer's Guide

Update the pre-test requirements to explicitly exclude the known-broken Sentry 3.0.0a1 release, preventing CI pre-tests from installing it.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Block the problematic Sentry 3.0.0a1 version in pre-test requirements
  • Added exclusion rule for Sentry version 3.0.0a1
 requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt
Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented May 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

A new exclusion has been added to the requirements file to prevent the installation of the sentry-sdk package version 3.0.0a1, aligning with the existing approach of excluding problematic package versions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt Excluded sentry-sdk==3.0.0a1 to avoid problematic version

Poem

A hop, a skip, a version to skip,
Sentry’s alpha’s not on our trip!
With careful paws, we mark the line—
“Not this one, friend, we’ll be just fine.”
The garden’s safe, the code will run,
Another patch, another bug shunned! 🐇✨

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block. 8000
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

sourcery-ai[bot]
sourcery-ai bot reviewed May 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed May 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt (1)

3-3: Suggest documenting the rationale.
To aid future maintainers, add a brief comment above this line explaining why 3.0.0a1 is blocked (e.g., link to the related issue or describe the regression).

Example:

+# Block sentry-sdk 3.0.0a1 due to data‐serialization regression (see issue #4567)
 sentry-sdk!=3.0.0a1
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c0b4a2 and 32c3087.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 300000ms (32)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_other test windows)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_other test macos)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Tests_linux test_linux)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller windows)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller macos_arm)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller macos)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds sdist)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Builds pyinstaller_linux)
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / windows-latest py 3.11 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.9 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.9 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / macos-14 py 3.12 latest PyQt6
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt6
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / macos-13 py 3.11 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.12 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.11 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.11 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.10 latest PyQt5 _pydantic_1
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 latest PySide6
  • GitHub Check: Base py3.10 / ubuntu-22.04 py 3.10 latest PySide2
  • GitHub Check: Test PartSeg minimal / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.9 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: test_coverage / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.12 latest PyQt5
  • GitHub Check: Test PartSeg conda
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-24.04 py3.12 --pre
  • GitHub Check: windows-2022 py3.12 --pre
  • GitHub Check: macos-14 py3.12 --pre
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Documentation_check help)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (Documentation_check Notebook_check)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (manifest_check manifest_check)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (formatting_check check_formating)
  • GitHub Check: 4DNucleome.PartSeg (GetTestData linux)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Test latest release PySide2 / ubuntu-24.04 py 3.10 napari54 PySide2
🔇 Additional comments (1)
requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt (1)

3-3: Exclusion of sentry-sdk 3.0.0a1 is consistent with existing blocks.
This matches the pattern used for other problematic pre-release versions in this file.

@Czaki Czaki merged commit 16ca703 into develop May 13, 2025
59 checks passed
@Czaki Czaki deleted the block_sentry_pre branch May 13, 2025 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai[bot] sourcery-ai[bot] left review comments

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.16.3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Czaki
0