8000 Fix: Fixed Default Attribute Scores; Fixed Attribute Score Randomness; Reworked Attribute Score Randomness Option; Added Starting Attribute Score Documentation by IllianiBird · Pull Request #6843 · MegaMek/mekhq · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Fix: Fixed Default Attribute Scores; Fixed Attribute Score Randomness; Reworked Attribute Score Randomness Option; Added Starting Attribute Score Documentation #6843

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 2, 2025

Conversation

IllianiBird
Copy link
Collaborator

Dev Notes

There were a few issues with starting attribute scores. Namely that some of the scores were wrong (0, in some places, or 41 charisma for LAM Pilots).

Attribute score randomization also wasn't correctly resetting attribute scores to their default value before randomizing. What this would mean is that character attributes would frequently spike towards one extreme or the other.

Regarding attribute score randomization, I didn't like the play feel of the extra randomness option. Especially as we didn't have a non-random attribute option. So I reworked the 'extra randomness' option. That now just toggles randomness on/off.

Marking this as 'high' as it could have significant impact on a players' campaign if they upgrade a campaign from 50.05 or 50.06 to 50.07.

…; Added Starting Attribute Score Documentation
@IllianiBird IllianiBird added Bug UX User experience Campaign Options Relates to, or includes, campaign option changes Severity: High Issues described as high severity as per the new issue form labels May 2, 2025
@IllianiBird IllianiBird self-assigned this May 2, 2025
Copy link
codecov bot commented May 2, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 35.29412% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 11.52%. Comparing base (04afa55) to head (3f2d5f0).
Report is 60 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ign/personnel/generator/DefaultSkillGenerator.java 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #6843   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     11.51%   11.52%           
- Complexity     6563     6567    +4     
=========================================
  Files          1100     1100           
  Lines        140989   140971   -18     
  Branches      21848    21845    -3     
=========================================
+ Hits          16237    16243    +6     
+ Misses       123056   123030   -26     
- Partials       1696     1698    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator
@Scoppio Scoppio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could add a type of point-buy in a next iteration, and allow players to set the base point-buy stack in the campaign options. This can help with the all random stuff

@IllianiBird
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That'll be coming in 50.07/50.08, with the new company generator. But yeah, definitely on my radar.

# Conflicts:
#	MekHQ/resources/mekhq/resources/CampaignOptionsDialog.properties
@Scoppio Scoppio merged commit 81ca58c into MegaMek:master May 2, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Campaign Options Relates to, or includes, campaign option changes Severity: High Issues described as high sever 4A88 ity as per the new issue form UX User experience
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0