8000 Adjusted default JVM options by rjhancock · Pull Request #7032 · MegaMek/mekhq · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Adjusted default JVM options #7032

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

rjhancock
Copy link
Collaborator

This ensures the default JVM options are generated with the Launch4j start up scripts for macOS/Linux systems.

@rjhancock rjhancock requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2025 20:54
Copy link
codecov bot commented May 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 12.04%. Comparing base (0b7d0cd) to head (a6c64ac).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #7032   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     12.04%   12.04%           
- Complexity     6887     6890    +3     
=========================================
  Files          1102     1102           
  Lines        142205   142205           
  Branches      21985    21985           
=========================================
+ Hits          17122    17128    +6     
+ Misses       123250   123243    -7     
- Partials       1833     1834    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rjhancock rjhancock merged commit e5856fb into MegaMek:master May 16, 2025
6 checks passed
@rjhancock rjhancock deleted the fix-jvm-options-in-build-scripts branch May 16, 2025 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0