8000 Yuqiang/oz level number also buggy by smallst · Pull Request #7493 · codecombat/codecombat · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Yuqiang/oz level number also buggy #7493

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

smallst
Copy link
Contributor
@smallst smallst commented Jun 4, 2024

image

Ozaria classroom.course.levels has a strange order compare to game-content. so let's use game-content for ozaria level number directly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Improved variable naming and logic in user level handling for better clarity and maintainability.
    • Simplified array iteration and object property access in campaign view.
    • Refined conditional checks for unlocking campaigns based on player levels.
  • New Features

    • Added a condition to check for utils.isCodeCombat before executing certain code in the teacher dashboard module content.

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes focus on code simplification and optimization across multiple files. In User.js, variables were replaced with constants for clarity. CampaignView.js saw refined object property access and conditional checks, enhancing readability and performance. In ModuleContent.vue, a condition was added to check if the context is CodeCombat before executing certain code blocks.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
app/models/User.js Replaced variable declarations with constants in the levels method for clearer logic.
app/views/play/CampaignView.js Simplified array iteration, object property access, and refined conditional checks.
ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/.../ModuleContent.vue Added a condition to check for utils.isCodeCombat before executing a block in getLevelNumber.

Poem

In code's vast realm, where logic thrives,
Constants now in User.js arrive.
Campaigns unlock with ease and grace,
As checks and loops find their place.
In ModuleContent.vue, a check so wise,
CodeCombat's flag now guides our eyes.
Simplified paths, our quest refined,
In this code, pure clarity we find.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
app/models/User.js (7)

Line range hint 69-73: Replace this with the class name in static context to avoid confusion.

- this refers to the class.
+ Use the class name instead.

Using this in a static context can lead to confusion as it does not behave as it might in instance methods. Replacing this with the explicit class name User clarifies the code.

Also applies to: 89-89, 96-96


Line range hint 91-91: Avoid assignments within expressions for clarity.

- let url = '/db/user/teachers/online'
- if (users != null) {
-   url += `?teachers=${encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(users))}`
- }
+ let url = '/db/user/teachers/online';
+ if (users != null) {
+   url = `/db/user/teachers/online?teachers=${encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(users))}`;
+ }

Assignments within expressions can lead to code that is hard to read and maintain. It's clearer to separate the assignment from the conditional logic.


Line range hint 93-93: Use template literals for string concatenation.

- return '/file/' + heroThangType.poseImage
+ return `/file/${heroThangType.poseImage}`

Using template literals instead of string concatenation enhances readability and is a more modern approach in JavaScript.


Line range hint 185-186: Remove unnecessary else clauses to simplify control flow.

- if (condition) {
-   // code
- } else {
-   // code
- }
+ if (condition) {
+   // code
+   return;
+ }
+ // code

Removing unnecessary else clauses after return statements simplifies the control flow and reduces the indentation level, making the code easier to read.

Also applies to: 348-353


Line range hint 257-257: Change to optional chaining for safer property access.

- const gemsPurchased = (left1 = this.get('purchased')?.gems) != null ? left1 : 0
+ const gemsPurchased = this.get('purchased')?.gems ?? 0

Using optional chaining with the nullish coalescing operator (??) provides a safer and more concise way to access deeply nested properties.


Line range hint 285-287: Prefer for...of over forEach for better performance and readability.

- courseInstanceIds.forEach(id => {
-   return courseInstancePromises.push(api.courseInstances.get({ courseInstanceID: id }))
- })
+ for (const id of courseInstanceIds) {
+   courseInstancePromises.push(api.courseInstances.get({ courseInstanceID: id }));
+ }

Using for...of provides a clearer and potentially more performant way to iterate over arrays, especially when combined with asynchronous operations.


Line range hint 381-385: Declare variables separately and avoid assignments in expressions.

- let left, left1, left2
- let gemsEarned = (left = this.get('earned')?.gems) != null ? left : 0
- const gemsPurchased = (left1 = this.get('purchased')?.gems) != null ? left1 : 0
- const gemsSpent = (left2 = this.get('spent')) != null ? left2 : 0
+ const gemsEarned = this.get('earned')?.gems ?? 0;
+ const gemsPurchased = this.get('purchased')?.gems ?? 0;
+ const gemsSpent = this.get('spent') ?? 0;

Separating variable declarations and avoiding assignments within expressions make the code cleaner and easier to understand.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 668cc43 and b1170b6.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/models/User.js (1 hunks)
  • app/views/play/CampaignView.js (2 hunks)
  • ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseCurriculumGuide/components/ModuleContent.vue (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/models/User.js

[error] 69-69: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 70-70: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 71-71: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 72-72: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 73-73: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 89-89: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 91-91: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.


[error] 93-93: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.


[error] 96-96: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 185-185: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.


[error] 186-186: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.


[error] 194-194: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.


[error] 253-253: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.


[error] 257-257: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.


[error] 285-287: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.


[error] 348-348: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.


[error] 353-353: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.


[error] 381-381: Declare variables separately

Unsafe fix: Break out into multiple declarations


[error] 382-382: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.


[error] 385-385: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

app/views/play/CampaignView.js

[error] 69-69: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 70-70: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 79-86: Avoid classes that contain only static members.

Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.


[error] 83-83: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 84-84: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 92-92: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 93-93: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 95-95: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 98-98: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 138-138: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 141-141: Using this in a static context can be confusing.

this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.


[error] 189-192: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.


[error] 306-306: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.


[error] 530-530: Declare variables separately

Unsafe fix: Break out into multiple declarations


[error] 531-531: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.


[error] 531-531: The comma operator is disallowed.

Its use is often confusing and obscures side effects.


[error] 532-532: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.


[error] 532-532: The comma operator is disallowed.

Its use is often confusing and obscures side effects.


[error] 548-548: Declare variables separately

Unsafe fix: Break out into multiple declarations


[error] 578-578: Declare variables separately

Unsafe fix: Break out into multiple declarations

Additional comments not posted (6)
ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseCurriculumGuide/components/ModuleContent.vue (1)

95-95: Ensure utils.isCodeCombat is defined and correctly checks the context.

Verification successful

Ensure utils.isCodeCombat is defined and correctly checks the context.

  • The utils.isCodeCombat is defined in app/core/utils.js and is used extensively across the codebase.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and usage of `utils.isCodeCombat` across the codebase.

# Test: Search for the definition and usage of `utils.isCodeCombat`. Expect: Definitions and multiple usages.
rg --type vue --type js 'isCodeCombat' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 87



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and usage of `utils.isCodeCombat` across the codebase.

# Test: Search for the definition and usage of `utils.isCodeCombat`. Expect: Definitions and multiple usages.
rg 'isCodeCombat' --glob '*.vue' --glob '*.js'

Length of output: 22386

app/models/User.js (1)

424-426: Refactor the levels method to use constants for better readability and immutability.

- const earned = this.get('earned')?.levels || []
- const purchased = this.get('purchased')?.levels || []
+ const earned = this.get('earned')?.levels || [];
+ const purchased = this.get('purchased')?.levels || [];

This change aligns with best practices by using const for variables that do not change, enhancing code clarity and reducing potential bugs.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

app/views/play/CampaignView.js (4)

750-753: Refactor array iteration to remove unnecessary use of Array.from.

This change simplifies the iteration over campaigns.models by directly using the array without converting it with Array.from, which is unnecessary in this context.


754-754: Simplify conditional check for session loading.

The use of optional chaining (?.) here simplifies the check for this.sessions.loaded, making the code cleaner and more readable.


754-754: Refactor accessing campaign levels to handle null values gracefully.

The change to use || {} ensures that the code does not break if campaign.get('levels') returns null or undefined, by providing an empty object as a fallback.


775-789: Refine conditional checks for unlocking adjacent campaigns.

The refactoring here simplifies the conditional logic by using more direct checks and removing unnecessary complexity. It also ensures that the campaign is found before attempting to modify its locked property, which prevents potential errors.

Copy link
Collaborator
@adamkecskes adamkecskes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I've tested, numbering was perfect on two accounts, both on classrooms list and inside classroom. Thanks for the fix @smallst

@smallst smallst merged commit 611b1d3 into master Jun 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@smallst smallst deleted the yuqiang/oz-level-number-also-buggy branch June 5, 2024 03:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
476F None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0