8000 Fix TeacherCourseSolutionView for Junior levels by nwinter · Pull Request #7711 · codecombat/codecombat · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Fix TeacherCourseSolutionView for Junior levels #7711

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Fix TeacherCourseSolutionView for Junior levels #7711

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

nwinter
Copy link
Contributor
@nwinter nwinter commented Sep 17, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Junior levels include succeeds: false test solutions we shouldn't show.

Junior levels sometimes have no sample code, which was not handled (it would say sample code is missing and coming soon).

Junior levels always translate their Python and other languages from JS, which wasn't handled and was having an error.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced solution filtering based on product type, ensuring only successful solutions are displayed for 'codecombat-junior'.
    • Improved handling of default code and translations in the teacher's course solution view.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Added optional chaining to prevent runtime errors when accessing language properties, enhancing code stability.
    • Ensured consistent formatting of translated default code, addressing potential rendering issues.

@nwinter
Fix TeacherCourseSolutionView for Junior levels
5dfa4da 
Junior levels include succeeds: false test solutions we shouldn't
show.

Junior levels sometimes have no sample code, which was not handled (it
would say sample code is missing and coming soon).

Junior levels always translate their Python and other languages from
JS, which wasn't handled and was having an error.
@nwinter nwinter requested a review from mrfinch September 17, 2024 19:08
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the LevelCollection module to filter solutions based on the product attribute, specifically for 'codecombat-junior'. Additionally, it enhances the TeacherCourseSolutionView.js file by implementing optional chaining for safer property access and ensuring consistent formatting of defaultCode and translatedDefaultCode. These changes aim to improve the handling of solutions and code rendering within the application.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/collections/Levels.js Adjusted solution filtering logic based on the product attribute, specifically for 'codecombat-junior'.
app/views/teachers/TeacherCourseSolutionView.js Enhanced handling of defaultCode and translatedDefaultCode with optional chaining and new checks for falsy values.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐇 In the code where levels play,
Solutions filtered, bright as day.
With checks in place, no errors near,
A safer path for all to cheer!
For junior coders, joy we bring,
In every line, let coding sing! 🎉

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 593d763 and 5dfa4da.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/collections/Levels.js (1 hunks)
  • app/views/teachers/TeacherCourseSolutionView.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
app/collections/Levels.js (1)

46-49: LGTM!

The code segment correctly filters out unsuccessful test case solutions for junior levels, aligning with the PR objective. This improves the accuracy and relevance of the solutions displayed to users.

app/views/teachers/TeacherCourseSolutionView.js (2)

173-173: LGTM!

The use of optional chaining here safely handles cases where programmableMethod.languages might be undefined, preventing potential runtime errors. The fallback logic remains unchanged.

175-180: Looks good!

The changes here mirror the previous segment, using optional chaining for safe property access.

Additionally, explicitly setting translatedDefaultCode to a newline character if it's falsy is a good practice. It distinguishes between intentionally empty starter code and a non-existent value, ensuring consistent output formatting.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mrfinch mrfinch merged commit d75da17 into master Sep 17, 2024
2 checks passed
@mrfinch mrfinch deleted the nwinter/fix-junior-course-solution branch September 17, 2024 20:39
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
Merged
This was referenced Sep 26, 2024
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Oct 14, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Nov 7, 2024
Merged
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 27, 2024
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mrfinch mrfinch mrfinch approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nwinter @mrfinch
0