WIP - Add Free/Sales-Call/Paid badges to Modules #7738
Conversation
Still need to get a couple more of these in.
Teacher dashboard class view and curriculum guide, plus parent dashboard Ozaria progress view, now read module information from `course.modules` instead of utils.js. We also can use i18n for various module properties. Claude decaffeination style fixup on I18NEditCourseView.js.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new CSS class for tooltips, enhancements to the global Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
app/models/User.js
Outdated
| @@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ module.exports = (User = (function () { | |||
| isSmokeTestUser () { return User.isSmokeTestUser(this.attributes) } | |||
| isIndividualUser () { return !this.isStudent() && !User.isTeacher(this.attributes) } | |||
|
|
|||
| getSubscriptionLevel () { | |||
| return 'free' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
need to modify this. On vue, we can use this: https://github.com/codecombat/codecombat/blob/master/app/core/store/modules/me.js#L61
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.stories.js (4)
1-20: LGTM! Consider adding more descriptive titles for controls.The import statement and default export configuration look good. The
argTypesare well-defined and match the PR objectives.Consider adding more descriptive titles for the controls to improve the Storybook UI:
argTypes: { level: { control: { type: 'select', options: ['free', 'sales-call', 'paid'] }, description: 'The access level of the user', + table: { defaultValue: { summary: 'free' } }, + name: 'Access Level', }, displayText: { control: 'boolean', description: 'Whether to display the text or not', + table: { defaultValue: { summary: true } }, + name: 'Display Text', }, displayIcon: { control: 'boolean', description: 'Whether to display the icon or not', + table: { defaultValue: { summary: true } }, + name: 'Display Icon', }, },
28-33: LGTM! Consider adding more variations for the Free story.The Free story is correctly implemented and matches the PR objectives.
Consider adding more variations to cover different combinations of
displayTextanddisplayIcon:export const FreeTextOnly = Template.bind({}) FreeTextOnly.args = { level: 'free', displayText: true, displayIcon: false, } export const FreeIconOnly = Template.bind({}) FreeIconOnly.args = { level: 'free', displayText: false, displayIcon: true, } export const FreeBoth = Template.bind({}) FreeBoth.args = { level: 'free', displayText: true, displayIcon: true, }
35-47: LGTM! Consider adding more variations for SalesCall and Paid stories.The SalesCall and Paid stories are correctly implemented and match the PR objectives.
Similar to the suggestion for the Free story, consider adding more variations to cover different combinations of
displayTextanddisplayIconfor both SalesCall and Paid levels. This will provide a more comprehensive set of examples in the Storybook:export const SalesCallTextOnly = Template.bind({}) SalesCallTextOnly.args = { level: 'sales-call', displayText: true, displayIcon: false, } export const SalesCallBoth = Template.bind({}) SalesCallBoth.args = { level: 'sales-call', displayText: true, displayIcon: true, } export const PaidTextOnly = Template.bind({}) PaidTextOnly.args = { level: 'paid', displayText: true, displayIcon: false, } export const PaidIconOnly = Template.bind({}) PaidIconOnly.args = { level: 'paid', displayText: false, displayIcon: true, }
1-47: Overall, great implementation. Consider adding tests and improving documentation.The AccessLevelIndicator stories are well-implemented and cover the main use cases as per the PR objectives. Great job on following Storybook best practices!
To further improve this file:
- Add more variations for each level to cover all combinations of
displayTextanddisplayIcon, as suggested in previous comments.- Consider adding JSDoc comments to the story exports to provide more context in the Storybook UI.
- Think about adding unit tests for the AccessLevelIndicator component, if not already present in another file.
- You might want to add a brief description of the AccessLevelIndicator component at the top of the file using the
parametersproperty in the default export:export default { title: 'AccessLevelIndicator', component: AccessLevelIndicator, parameters: { componentSubtitle: 'A component to display the user\'s access level', docs: { description: { component: 'The AccessLevelIndicator displays a badge indicating whether a module is free, requires a sales call, or is paid.' } } }, // ... rest of the configuration }These improvements will enhance the documentation and usability of the component in Storybook.
.storybook/preview.js (3)
182-184: Approve addition ofgetSubscriptionLevel()method with a suggestion.The addition of the
getSubscriptionLevel()method aligns with the PR objectives. However, the current implementation always returns 'free', which might lead to unexpected behavior if not updated in the future.Consider adding a TODO comment to remind about the future implementation:
getSubscriptionLevel() { + // TODO: Implement actual subscription level logic return 'free' }
235-236: Approve VTooltip registration and suggest minor cleanup.The registration of VTooltip as a Vue plugin is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. However, the empty line after the registration can be removed for better code organization.
Consider removing the empty line after the VTooltip registration:
Vue.use(VTooltip.default) -
Line range hint
1-284: Summary of changes and their impactThe changes in this file successfully lay the groundwork for the AccessLevelIndicator component and subscription-based badge visibility as outlined in the PR objectives. The addition of VTooltip and the
getSubscriptionLevel()method are key components for this feature.However, there are a few areas where the code could be improved:
- Consistency in import syntax (using ES6 imports)
- Adding TODO comments for future implementations
- Removing unnecessary empty lines
These changes will enhance code readability and maintainability. Overall, the modifications align well with the PR's goals and provide a solid foundation for the new feature.
Consider creating a separate file for user-related functions (like
getSubscriptionLevel()) in the future if more user-specific functionality is added. This will help maintain a clear separation of concerns and improve code organization.app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (4)
60-65: Rename local variable for clarity in 'badgeText' computed propertyIn the
badgeTextcomputed property, the local variable is namedtooltips, but it actually contains the badge text values. For better readability and maintainability, consider renaming it tobadgeTexts.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
badgeText () { - const tooltips = { + const badgeTexts = { free: 'Free', 'sales-call': 'Call Now!', paid: 'Premium', } - return tooltips[this.level] || '' + return badgeTexts[this.level] || '' },
67-74: Rename local variable for clarity in 'icon' computed propertySimilarly, in the
iconcomputed property, renaming the local variable fromiconstoiconMapor a more descriptive name can enhance code clarity.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
icon () { - const icons = { + const iconMap = { free: '✨', 'sales-call': '📞', paid: '🔒', } - return icons[this.level] || '' + return iconMap[this.level] || '' },
87-97: Avoid hyphens in CSS class namesThe CSS classes
.badge-free,.badge-sales-call, and.badge-paiduse hyphens, which can potentially lead to issues when dynamically generating class names in JavaScript. Consider replacing hyphens with underscores or using camelCase to ensure consistency.Apply this diff to rename the classes:
-.badge-free { +.badgeFree { background-color: green; } -.badge-sales-call { +.badgeSalesCall { background-color: orange; } -.badge-paid { +.badgePaid { background-color: red; }And update the computed property
badgeClassaccordingly:badgeClass () { return { badge: true, - [`badge-${this.level}`]: true, + [`badge${this.level.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + this.level.slice(1)}`]: true, } },
80-85: Ensure sufficient color contrast for accessibilityThe badge styles use white text on colored backgrounds. Verify that the color combinations meet the WCAG guidelines for color contrast to ensure readability for all users.
Consider adjusting the background colors or text color to meet accessibility standards. Tools like the WebAIM Contrast Checker can help assess color contrast ratios.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- .storybook/container.scss (1 hunks)
- .storybook/preview.js (3 hunks)
- app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.stories.js (1 hunks)
- app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (1 hunks)
- app/components/common/labels/CodeRenderer.vue (1 hunks)
- app/models/User.js (1 hunks)
- ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseCurriculumGuide/components/ModuleHeader.vue (5 hunks)
- ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseSingleClass/index.vue (2 hunks)
- ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseSingleClass/table/TableClassFrame.vue (1 hunks)
- ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseSingleClass/table/TableModuleHeader.vue (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
.storybook/container.scss (3)
3-5: Verify the impact of extending %frontend-page to Storybook componentsExtending %frontend-page to .sb-show-main and .sb-story classes might affect the isolated nature of Storybook components. While this could provide consistent styling with the main application, it might also override Storybook's default styles.
Please confirm:
- Is this extension necessary for all Storybook components?
- Could this affect the ability to view components in isolation?
- Are there any specific styles from %frontend-page that are required for these Storybook classes?
Consider using a more specific class or mixin if only certain styles are needed, to maintain better separation between Storybook and application styles.
Line range hint
1-9: Clarify the relationship between these changes and the PR objectivesThe changes in this file seem to be somewhat disconnected from the main objectives of the PR as described. The PR mentions adding Free/Sales-Call/Paid badges to Modules and introducing an AccessLevelIndicator component, but the changes in this file are related to Storybook styling and a generic tooltip.
Could you please clarify:
- How do these Storybook and tooltip styles relate to the AccessLevelIndicator component and the new badges?
- Are there other files where the main functionality described in the PR objectives is implemented?
- Is this file part of the necessary setup for showcasing the new component in Storybook?
Providing this context would help in understanding how these changes fit into the larger scope of the PR.
7-9:⚠️ Potential issueReconsider the use of !important and clarify the purpose of the tooltip
The addition of the .tooltip class with
opacity: 1 !important;raises a few concerns:
- The use of !important is generally discouraged as it can lead to specificity issues and make styles harder to maintain or override when needed.
- Setting opacity to 1 forcefully makes the tooltip always visible, which might not be the desired behavior in all cases.
Consider the following:
- Can we achieve the same result without using !important? If not, please explain why it's necessary here.
- Is the intention to make all tooltips permanently visible? If not, what specific use case is this addressing?
- How does this tooltip relate to the AccessLevelIndicator badges mentioned in the PR objectives?
Please provide more context on the purpose of this tooltip style and consider alternative approaches that don't rely on !important if possible.
app/components/common/labels/CodeRenderer.vue (3)
1-3: LGTM: Component structure follows Vue 2 best practices.The component is correctly defined using the Vue 2 object-based syntax. The use of a render function instead of a template is appropriate for this use case.
Also applies to: 12-13
3-8: LGTM: Props definition is clear and follows best practices.The 'content' prop is well-defined with a clear type (String) and is correctly set as required. This ensures that the component will always receive the necessary data to function properly.
9-11:⚠️ Potential issueConsider security implications and edge cases in the render function.
While the render function effectively converts backticks to
<code>tags, there are a few points to consider:
Security: Using
innerHTMLcan potentially lead to XSS vulnerabilities. Consider using a sanitization library or Vue's built-inv-htmldirective with appropriate sanitization.Edge cases: The current regex might not handle nested backticks or escaped backticks correctly. Consider using a more robust parsing method.
Error handling: Add a check for
undefinedornullcontent to prevent potential runtime errors.Here's a suggested improvement:
render (h) { if (!this.content) return h('span'); const sanitizedContent = this.sanitizeHTML(this.content); const formattedContent = this.formatCode(sanitizedContent); return h('span', { domProps: { innerHTML: formattedContent } }); }, methods: { sanitizeHTML(html) { // Implement HTML sanitization here }, formatCode(content) { // Implement a more robust code formatting method here return content.replace(/`(.*?)`/g, '<code>$1</code>'); } }Consider adding appropriate HTML sanitization and improving the code formatting logic.
To verify the security implications, you can run the following script:
app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.stories.js (1)
22-26: LGTM! Template function is well-implemented.The Template function is correctly implemented, following Storybook best practices. It dynamically binds all props and renders the AccessLevelIndicator component.
ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseCurriculumGuide/components/ModuleHeader.vue (5)
9-11: LGTM: New component imports added correctly.The import statements for
CodeRendererandAccessLevelIndicatorare correctly added and align with the PR objectives of introducing badges for different access levels.
18-20: LGTM: New components registered correctly.The
CodeRendererandAccessLevelIndicatorcomponents are properly registered in the components section, allowing their use in the template.
25-25: LGTM: Improved code style with trailing commas.The addition of trailing commas in the props section enhances code consistency and facilitates easier future modifications.
Also applies to: 29-29, 33-33, 37-37, 41-42
51-51: LGTM: Consistent code style in computed properties.The addition of a trailing comma after
getTrackCategoryin the computed properties section maintains consistency with the earlier style improvements.Also applies to: 60-60
110-111: LGTM with a question: New components integrated correctly.The
code-rendererandaccess-level-indicatorcomponents are properly integrated into the template, aligning with the PR objectives. Thecode-renderereffectively replaces therenderModuleNamemethod.However, could you please clarify how the
getModuleInfo.accessproperty is populated? It's used as a prop for theaccess-level-indicator, but its source isn't immediately clear from the provided code.To verify the existence and population of the
accessproperty, please run the following script:ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseSingleClass/table/TableClassFrame.vue (1)
120-125: Approve changes with suggestions for consistency 8000 and prop types.The changes align with the PR objectives by introducing the 'access' property, which likely corresponds to the subscription level (free, sales-call, or paid) for each module. This is a good step towards implementing the AccessLevelIndicator functionality.
However, to ensure consistency and maintain code quality:
- Verify that this change doesn't break any existing functionality in the TableModuleHeader component.
- Update the table-module-grid component (around line 146) to use 'access' instead of 'moduleNum' for consistency.
- Update the prop types in the script section to reflect the new 'access' property in the modules array.
To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in the usage of 'moduleNum' and 'access' properties across related components.
app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (1)
15-16: Verify 'ACCESS_LEVELS' import and structureEnsure that
ACCESS_LEVELSis correctly imported and structured as an array. Any changes in the schema could affect the validator function for thelevelprop.Run the following script to confirm the value of
ACCESS_LEVELS:ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseSingleClass/table/TableModuleHeader.vue (5)
12-14: Imports for CourseSchema, CodeRenderer, and AccessLevelIndicator are appropriate
57-58: Components CodeRenderer and AccessLevelIndicator are correctly added
87-93: Ensure the 'access' prop validator correctly references the schemaThe validator function uses
CourseSchema.properties.modules.additionalProperties.properties.access.enum. Please verify that this path is correct and that theenumarray contains the valid access levels. This will ensure that theaccessprop accepts only the intended values and prevents potential runtime errors.
221-221: Improved security by replacingv-htmlwithCodeRendererUsing the
<code-renderer>component instead ofv-htmlto displaymoduleHeadingenhances security by reducing the risk of XSS attacks.
221-225: EnsureAccessLevelIndicatorhandles undefinedlevelprop appropriatelySince the
accessprop has a default value ofundefined, please confirm that theAccessLevelIndicatorcomponent can handle an undefinedlevelprop without causing rendering issues or errors.Run the following script to verify how
AccessLevelIndicatorhandles an undefinedlevelprop:✅ Verification successful
AccessLevelIndicatorProperly Handles UndefinedlevelPropThe
levelprop inAccessLevelIndicator.vueis defined with a default value of'free', ensuring that it handlesundefinedvalues without causing rendering issues or errors.
- Definition:
level: { type: String, required: true, validator: value => ACCESS_LEVELS.includes(value), default: 'free', },🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `AccessLevelIndicator` component handles undefined `level` prop safely. # Expected result: The component should handle `level` being undefined without errors. rg "props.*level" --multiline app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue -A 10Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the props definition for `level` in AccessLevelIndicator.vue. ast-grep --lang vue --pattern $'props: { level: { $$$ }, $$$ }' app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vueLength of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of the `level` prop within AccessLevelIndicator.vue. rg "level" app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue -A 10Length of output: 1236
ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/BaseSingleClass/index.vue (3)
158-164: Passing 'access' property tocreateModuleStatsTableThe
accessproperty is correctly passed tocreateModuleStatsTable, ensuring that module access levels are included as intended.
628-628: Updated method signature to includeaccessThe method signature of
createModuleStatsTablenow appropriately includes theaccessparameter in the destructured arguments.
632-632: Includingaccessin the returned objectThe
accessproperty is properly included in the returned object fromcreateModuleStatsTable, which will allow for correct handling of module access levels downstream.
| const VTooltip = require('v-tooltip') | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using ES6 import syntax for consistency with modern practices.
While the use of require is consistent with other imports in this file, consider using ES6 import syntax for better alignment with modern JavaScript practices. Also, the empty line after the import can be removed.
Here's a suggested change:
-const VTooltip = require('v-tooltip')
-
+import VTooltip from 'v-tooltip';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const VTooltip = require('v-tooltip') | |
| import VTooltip from 'v-tooltip'; |
app/models/User.js
Outdated
| getSubscriptionLevel () { | ||
| return 'free' | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Implement actual subscription level logic
The current implementation of getSubscriptionLevel() in app/models/User.js always returns 'free', which may not accurately reflect the user's subscription status. Given the existing methods like isPaidTeacher(), isPaidOnlineClassUser(), and premiumEndDate(), it is recommended to:
- Utilize these existing methods to determine the actual subscription level dynamically.
- Replace the hardcoded return value with logic that assesses the user's subscription data.
- Ensure consistency with Vue-related subscription logic found in
app/core/store/modules/me.js.
🔗 Analysis chain
Implement actual subscription level logic
The current implementation of getSubscriptionLevel() always returns 'free', which may not accurately reflect the user's subscription status. Consider the following points:
- Implement logic to determine the actual subscription level based on the user's data.
- If this is a placeholder, add a TODO comment explaining the intended functionality.
- There's an unaddressed past review comment suggesting a different implementation for Vue. Consider incorporating that feedback if applicable.
Could you please clarify the intended purpose of this method and its current implementation status? Is this a work in progress, or are there plans to expand its functionality in the future?
To verify the current subscription logic, we can check for existing methods or properties related to subscription status:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for existing subscription-related methods:"
rg -n 'subscription|premium|isPaid' app/models/User.js
echo "\nChecking for Vue-related subscription logic:"
rg -n 'subscription' app/core/store/modules/me.js
Length of output: 958
| free: 'Explore our levels at no cost!', | ||
| 'sales-call': 'Interested in more? Give us a call and unlock!', | ||
| paid: 'This content is exclusive to users with a valid license.', | ||
| } | ||
| return tooltips[this.level] || '' | ||
| }, | ||
| badgeText () { | ||
| const tooltips = { | ||
| free: 'Free', | ||
| 'sales-call': 'Call Now!', | ||
| paid: 'Premium', | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Externalize user-facing strings for localization
The strings used in tooltipText and badgeText are hardcoded in English. For better internationalization support, consider externalizing these strings using a localization library or a translation mechanism.
Extract the strings into a localization file or use your existing localization solution to handle translations.
| level: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true, | ||
| validator: value => ACCESS_LEVELS.includes(value), | ||
| default: 'free', | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Conflict between 'required' and 'default' in 'level' prop definition
The level prop is marked as both required: true and has a default value of 'free'. In Vue.js, if a prop is required, the default value will not be used because the component expects the prop to be provided. To resolve this conflict, either set required to false if you want the default value to be used when the prop is not provided, or remove the default value if the prop must always be supplied.
Apply this diff to fix the conflict:
level: {
type: String,
- required: true,
+ required: false,
validator: value => ACCESS_LEVELS.includes(value),
default: 'free',
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| level: { | |
| type: String, | |
| required: true, | |
| validator: value => ACCESS_LEVELS.includes(value), | |
| default: 'free', | |
| }, | |
| level: { | |
| type: String, | |
| required: false, | |
| validator: value => ACCESS_LEVELS.includes(value), | |
| default: 'free', | |
| }, |
| isDisplayable () { | ||
| const userDisplayMap = { | ||
| free: ['free', 'sales-call'], // non-paying users will see the 'free' and 'sales-call' badges | ||
| 'sales-call': ['paid'], // users after sales call will see the 'paid' badges | ||
| paid: [], // I'm not sure if we'll have this for users, but if we'll have no badges needed. | ||
| } | ||
| return userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()].includes(this.level) | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring 'isDisplayable' logic
The logic in the isDisplayable computed property may be confusing and could lead to maintenance issues. Consider refactoring it for clarity.
One approach is to invert the mapping to directly map this.level to an array of user subscription levels that can view it.
isDisplayable () {
- const userDisplayMap = {
- free: ['free', 'sales-call'],
- 'sales-call': ['paid'],
- paid: [],
- }
- return (userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()] || []).includes(this.level)
+ const levelVisibilityMap = {
+ free: ['free', 'sales-call', 'paid'],
+ 'sales-call': ['sales-call', 'paid'],
+ paid: ['paid'],
+ }
+ return (levelVisibilityMap[this.level] || []).includes(me.getSubscriptionLevel())
}This way, you define which user subscription levels can see each badge level, which might be more intuitive.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| isDisplayable () { | |
| const userDisplayMap = { | |
| free: ['free', 'sales-call'], // non-paying users will see the 'free' and 'sales-call' badges | |
| 'sales-call': ['paid'], // users after sales call will see the 'paid' badges | |
| paid: [], // I'm not sure if we'll have this for users, but if we'll have no badges needed. | |
| } | |
| return userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()].includes(this.level) | |
| }, | |
| isDisplayable () { | |
| const levelVisibilityMap = { | |
| free: ['free', 'sales-call', 'paid'], | |
| 'sales-call': ['sales-call', 'paid'], | |
| paid: ['paid'], | |
| } | |
| return (levelVisibilityMap[this.level] || []).includes(me.getSubscriptionLevel()) | |
| }, |
Undefined variable 'me' in 'isDisplayable' computed property
The variable me used in me.getSubscriptionLevel() is not defined within the component. This will cause a ReferenceError at runtime. Ensure that me is properly imported or accessible within the component's context.
Consider importing or injecting me into the component:
+import me from 'core/auth' // Update the import path as necessary
export default {
name: 'AccessLevelIndicator',If me is a global variable, you might need to reference it as window.me or access it through a Vuex store or another state management solution.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| free: ['free', 'sales-call'], // non-paying users will see the 'free' and 'sales-call' badges | ||
| 'sales-call': ['paid'], // users after sales call will see the 'paid' badges | ||
| paid: [], // I'm not sure if we'll have this for users, but if we'll have no badges needed. | ||
| } | ||
| return userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()].includes(this.level) | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle undefined subscription levels in 'isDisplayable'
If me.getSubscriptionLevel() returns a value not present in userDisplayMap, accessing userDisplayMap[undefined] will result in undefined, causing an error when calling includes on it. To prevent this, provide a default array when the subscription level is unrecognized.
Apply this diff to handle unrecognized subscription levels:
return userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()].includes(this.level)
+ return (userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()] || []).includes(this.level)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| free: ['free', 'sales-call'], // non-paying users will see the 'free' and 'sales-call' badges | |
| 'sales-call': ['paid'], // users after sales call will see the 'paid' badges | |
| paid: [], // I'm not sure if we'll have this for users, but if we'll have no badges needed. | |
| } | |
| return userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()].includes(this.level) | |
| }, | |
| free: ['free', 'sales-call'], // non-paying users will see the 'free' and 'sales-call' badges | |
| 'sales-call': ['paid'], // users after sales call will see the 'paid' badges | |
| paid: [], // I'm not sure if we'll have this for users, but if we'll have no badges needed. | |
| } | |
| return (userDisplayMap[me.getSubscriptionLevel()] || []).includes(this.level) | |
| }, |
| free: '✨', | ||
| 'sales-call': '📞', | ||
| paid: '🔒', | ||
| } | ||
| return icons[this.level] || '' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent icons instead of emojis
Using emojis for icons may lead to inconsistent rendering across different platforms and devices. It's better to use consistent icon components or SVGs that align with the application's design system.
Consider importing and using icon components from your UI library. For example:
+import FreeIcon from 'components/icons/FreeIcon.vue'
+import SalesCallIcon from 'components/icons/SalesCallIcon.vue'
+import PaidIcon from 'components/icons/PaidIcon.vue'
// In computed property
icon () {
- const icons = {
- free: '✨',
- 'sales-call': '📞',
- paid: '🔒',
+ const icons = {
+ free: FreeIcon,
+ 'sales-call': SalesCallIcon,
+ paid: PaidIcon,
}
return icons[this.level] || ''
},And update the template to use the icon components:
<span v-if="displayIcon">
- {{ icon }}
+ <component :is="icon" />
</span>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (3)
1-12: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for accessibility.The template implementation looks good. The use of v-if for conditional rendering, v-tooltip for tooltips, and $t for translations are all appropriate.
Consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility. For example:
<span v-if="isDisplayable" v-tooltip.bottom="{ content: $t(`paywall.badge_tooltip_${level}`), }" :class="badgeClass" + role="status" + :aria-label="$t(`paywall.badge_${level}`)" >This change will help screen readers to properly announce the badge status.
63-82: Align badge colors with the application's design systemThe current color choices for the badges (green, orange, red) might not align with your application's color scheme. Consider using color variables from your design system to ensure consistency across the application.
Here's a suggestion:
@import '~styles/variables.scss'; // Adjust the import path as needed .badge-free { background-color: $color-free-badge; } .badge-sales-call { background-color: $color-sales-call-badge; } .badge-paid { background-color: $ F438 color-paid-badge; }This approach allows for easier maintenance and ensures consistency with your overall design.
1-82: Consider localizing access level valuesWhile the component correctly uses $t for translating badge text and tooltips, the access level values ('free', 'sales-call', 'paid') are used as keys and might need to be localized for a fully internationalized application.
Consider creating a mapping between internal level values and localized display values. For example:
computed: { localizedLevel() { return this.$t(`paywall.access_level_${this.level}`); } }Then use
localizedLevelinstead oflevelwhen displaying text to the user. This allows you to keep the internal logic using English keys while presenting localized text to the user.app/locale/en.js (3)
Line range hint
1-6291: Overall structure and organization looks good.The file is well-organized with clear categories for different parts of the application. The use of nested objects helps keep related translations grouped together, which is a good practice for maintainability.
However, given the size of this file (over 6000 lines), it might be worth considering splitting it into smaller, more manageable files for each major section of the application. This could improve maintainability and make it easier for developers to work on specific areas without navigating such a large file.
Consider splitting this large translation file into smaller, more focused files for each major section of the application. For example:
// app/locale/en/common.js export const common = { // ... common translations }; // app/locale/en/play.js export const play = { // ... play-related translations }; // ... other sections // app/locale/en.js import { common } from './en/common'; import { play } from './en/play'; // ... other imports export default { common, play, // ... other sections };This approach would make the translations more modular and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1357-1605: The 'new_home' section is well-structured but could benefit from some improvements.The translations in this section are comprehensive and cover various aspects of the home page. However, there are a few areas that could be enhanced:
Inconsistent use of quotation marks:
Some strings use single quotes, while others use double quotes. For consistency, it's better to stick to one style throughout.HTML tags in translation strings:
There are several instances of HTML tags within the translation strings. While this works, it's generally better to keep markup separate from translations to improve maintainability and allow for easier styling changes.Long strings without line breaks:
Some translation strings are quite long and could benefit from being split across multiple lines for improved readability.Here's an example of how you could improve one of the translations:
new_home: { // ... other translations ... game_based_blurb: ` CodeCombat is a game-based computer science program where students type real code and see their characters react in real time. `.trim(), // ... other translations ... },This approach uses template literals for multi-line strings and removes HTML tags from the translation.
Consider using a linter with rules for consistent quote usage and maximum line length to maintain consistency throughout the file.
Line range hint
2431-2859: The 'courses' section is comprehensive but could use some refinements.This section covers a wide range of course-related translations, which is great for internationalization. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:
Inconsistent use of placeholders:
Some strings use__placeholderName__format, while others use{{placeholderName}}. It would be better to stick to one format for consistency.Mixed use of HTML:
Similar to the 'new_home' section, there are instances of HTML mixed with plain text. It's generally better to keep markup separate from translations.Potential for grouping:
Some related translations (e.g., those pertaining to licenses or class management) could be grouped into sub-objects for better organization.Here's an example of how you could improve the organization:
courses: { // ... other translations ... licenses: { get_enrollments_blurb: "We'll help you build a solution that meets the needs of your class, school or district.", see_also_our: 'See also our', for_more_funding_resources: 'for how to leverage CARES Act funding sources like ESSER and GEER.' }, class_management: { add_students: 'Add Students', stats: 'Statistics', total_students: 'Total students:', average_time: 'Average level play time:', total_time: 'Total play time:', average_levels: 'Average levels completed:', total_levels: 'Total levels completed:', // ... other related translations ... }, // ... other translations ... },This grouping can make it easier to find and manage related translations.
Consider using a consistent format for placeholders throughout the file, preferably
__placeholderName__as it's used more frequently in this file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (1 hunks)
- app/locale/en.js (1 hunks)
- app/models/User.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/models/User.js
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (2)
14-35: LGTM! Props are well-defined.The component definition and props look good. The use of CourseSchema for ACCESS_LEVELS ensures consistency with the course model.
The previous comment about the conflict between 'required' and 'default' in the 'level' prop has been addressed. The current implementation with
required: falseand a default value is correct.
37-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor 'isDisplayable' for clarity and robustness
The current implementation of
isDisplayablemight be confusing and could lead to maintenance issues. Consider refactoring it for clarity and to handle potential undefined values.Here's a suggested refactor:
isDisplayable() { const levelVisibilityMap = { free: ['free', 'sales-call', 'paid'], 'sales-call': ['sales-call', 'paid'], paid: ['paid'], }; const userLevel = me.getSubscriptionLevel(); return (levelVisibilityMap[this.level] || []).includes(userLevel); }This approach defines which user subscription levels can see each badge level, which might be more intuitive and easier to maintain.
Also, ensure that
meis properly imported or accessible within the component's context:If
meis a global variable, you might need to reference it aswindow.meor access it through a Vuex store or another state management solution.
| icon () { | ||
| const icons = { | ||
| free: '✨', | ||
| 'sales-call': '📞', | ||
| paid: '🔒', | ||
| } | ||
| return icons[this.level] || '' | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using consistent icons instead of emojis
Using emojis for icons may lead to inconsistent rendering across different platforms and devices. It's better to use consistent icon components or SVGs that align with the application's design system.
Consider importing and using icon components from your UI library. For example:
import FreeIcon from 'components/icons/FreeIcon.vue'
import SalesCallIcon from 'components/icons/SalesCallIcon.vue'
import PaidIcon from 'components/icons/PaidIcon.vue'
// In computed property
icon() {
const icons = {
free: FreeIcon,
'sales-call': SalesCallIcon,
paid: PaidIcon,
}
return icons[this.level] || null
},Then update the template to use the icon components:
<component :is="icon" v-if="displayIcon && icon" />This approach ensures consistent rendering across all platforms and devices.
| paywall: { | ||
| badge_free: 'Free', | ||
| 'badge_sales-call': 'Call Now!', | ||
| badge_paid: 'Premium', | ||
| badge_tooltip_free: 'Explore our levels at no cost!', | ||
| 'badge_tooltip_sales-call': 'Interested in more? Give us a call and unlock!', | ||
| badge_tooltip_paid: 'This content is exclusive to users with a valid license.', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
The new 'paywall' section is a good addition but needs some adjustments for consistency.
The 'paywall' section introduces translations for badges and tooltips related to content access levels. While this is a valuable addition, there are a few points to address:
-
Inconsistent indentation:
The 'paywall' section is not indented properly compared to other sections in the file. It should be aligned with other top-level keys. -
Inconsistent key naming:
The key 'badge_sales-call' uses a hyphen, which is inconsistent with the camelCase naming convention used elsewhere in the file. -
Quotation marks:
Some strings use single quotes, while others use double quotes. For consistency, it's better to stick to one style.
Here's how you could improve the 'paywall' section:
module.exports = {
// ... other translations ...
paywall: {
badgeFree: 'Free',
badgeSalesCall: 'Call Now!',
badgePaid: 'Premium',
badgeTooltipFree: 'Explore our levels at no cost!',
badgeTooltipSalesCall: 'Interested in more? Give us a call and unlock!',
badgeTooltipPaid: 'This content is exclusive to users with a valid license.'
}
};This refactored version:
- Uses consistent camelCase for key names
- Aligns with the overall structure of the file
- Uses consistent quotation marks (single quotes in this case, but double quotes would also be fine if used consistently)
Ensure that this new section is placed logically within the overall structure of the translations object, possibly grouping it with other related sections if applicable.
app/models/User.js
Outdated
| @@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ module.exports = (User = (function () { | |||
| isSmokeTestUser () { return User.isSmokeTestUser(this.attributes) } | |||
| isIndividualUser () { return !this.isStudent() && !User.isTeacher(this.attributes) } | |||
|
|
|||
| getSubscriptionLevel () { | |||
| return (this.isPaidTeacher() || this.isPremium()) ? 'paid' : 'free' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is not a correct check. If u see comment in isPaidTeacher
// TODO: this doesn't actually check to see if they are paid (having prepaids), confusing
// use isPaidTeacher from me.js in vuex store for vue
Use the check from vue store me.js or fetch prepaids and check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/core/store/modules/prepaids.js (1)
146-150: LGTM: New action to ensure prepaids are loadedThe new
ensurePrepaidsLoadedForTeacheraction is a good addition:
- It prevents unnecessary API calls by checking both the prepaids state and the new
fetchedPrepaidsstate.- The implementation is correct and efficient.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this action, as it's a key optimization for preventing redundant API calls.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue (1 hunks)
- app/core/store/modules/prepaids.js (15 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/components/common/elements/AccessLevelIndicator.vue
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/core/store/modules/prepaids.js (8)
13-13: LGTM: State object updatesThe changes to the state object look good:
- Adding trailing commas improves maintainability.
- The new
fetchedPrepaidsproperty is a good addition for tracking fetched prepaids per teacher.Also applies to: 17-17, 21-24
28-30: LGTM: New mutation for tracking fetched prepaidsThe new
setFetchedPrepaidsForTeachermutation is well-implemented:
- It correctly uses
Vue.setfor reactive updates.- It corresponds to the new
fetchedPrepaidsstate property.
36-36: LGTM: Consistent use of trailing commasThe addition of trailing commas in mutations is a positive change:
- It improves code consistency throughout the file.
- It makes future additions and modifications easier.
- It aligns with modern JavaScript best practices.
Also applies to: 47-47, 60-60, 92-92, 101-101
142-142: LGTM: Consistent trailing comma in getterThe addition of a trailing comma in the
getJoinersForPrepaidgetter is consistent with the earlier changes and doesn't affect its functionality.
154-154: LGTM: Updates to fetchPrepaidsForTeacher actionThe changes to the
fetchPrepaidsForTeacheraction are good:
- Setting the
fetchedPrepaidsstate ensures proper tracking of fetched prepaids.- The added trailing comma maintains consistency with the rest of the file.
Also applies to: 166-166
182-182: LGTM: Consistent trailing comma in fetchPrepaidsForAPIClientThe addition of a trailing comma in the
fetchPrepaidsForAPIClientaction is consistent with earlier changes and doesn't affect its functionality.
268-268: LGTM: Consistent trailing commas in remaining actionsThe addition of trailing commas in the
applyLicenses,revokeLicenses, andgetTestLicenseactions is consistent with earlier changes:
- It improves overall code consistency.
- It makes future modifications easier.
- No functional changes were made to these actions.
Also applies to: 287-287, 295-297, 350-350, 358-360, 373-373, 379-380, 391-391, 404-405
Line range hint
1-405: Overall assessment: Excellent improvementsThis pull request makes several positive changes to the
prepaids.jsmodule:
- Consistent use of trailing commas throughout the file, improving maintainability and aligning with modern JavaScript best practices.
- Introduction of a new
fetchedPrepaidsstate and related mutation/action to track which teachers' prepaids have been fetched, potentially reducing unnecessary API calls.- The new
ensurePrepaidsLoadedForTeacheraction efficiently uses the new state to prevent redundant API requests.These changes should improve code consistency, maintainability, and potentially optimize performance. Great work!
New component created: AccessLevelIndicator.
It has the property
level<free|sales-call|paid>, and will show the badge accordingly.Also added the
User.getSubscriptionLevelfor further use. The visibility of the badges could depend on its value in the future.You can test by manually modifying the values here .
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AccessLevelIndicatorcomponent to visually represent user access levels.CodeRenderercomponent for inline code formatting.mewith a new method to retrieve subscription level.Bug Fixes
ModuleHeadercomponent.Documentation
AccessLevelIndicatorto demonstrate its usage.These updates enhance user experience by providing clearer access level indications, improved content rendering, and better tracking of subscription statuses.