allow creating updating ai-document, change source base node to objec… #7877
Conversation
…t and update schema of ai_document
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications across multiple files related to AI document handling and search functionality. The changes primarily focus on enhancing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
app/views/common/SearchView.js (1)
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Template handling of nameless models needs adjustment
The review of templates and views reveals potential issues:
- The common table template (
app/templates/common/table.pug) directly referencesdata.namewithout fallback handling- The table template uses name property in both display (
#{data.name}) and link title (title=data.name)- NewModelModal still shows name as a regular input field without indicating its optional status
Action items:
- Add fallback display text in table template when name is missing
- Update name field in NewModelModal to indicate it's optional
- Consider adding handling for name sorting when name is undefined
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
34-34: Verify template handling of nameless modelsThe changes look good but we should verify:
- How nameless models are displayed in listings/tables
- Impact on existing model filtering/sorting that might depend on name property
Also applies to: 77-78
Let me gather more specific information about the name property usage in sorting and filtering logic.
This will help us understand:
- How the SearchView handles name-based sorting/filtering
- How the NewModelModal template handles the name field
- How the common table template displays items with/without names
Let me check one more aspect to understand how the table handles documents without names.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for template files that might reference model names echo "Checking template files for name property usage..." rg -l "model\.name|\.name" "app/templates" # Search for name-dependent sorting/filtering echo "Checking for name-dependent logic..." rg -l "sort.*name|filter.*name" "app"Length of output: 5837
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check SearchView and related components for name-dependent sorting/filtering echo "Checking SearchView sorting/filtering implementation..." rg -A 5 "comparator.*name|sort.*name|filter.*name" app/views/common/SearchView.js # Check NewModelModal for name handling echo "Checking NewModelModal name handling..." rg -A 5 "name" app/templates/editor/modal/new-model-modal.pug # Check table template for name display echo "Checking common table template..." rg -A 5 "name" app/templates/common/table.pugLength of output: 1287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check table view implementation for name handling echo "Checking table view implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'class TableView { $$$ getRenderData() { $$$ } $$$ }' # Check if there's any fallback handling for missing names echo "Checking for name fallback logic..." rg -A 5 "data\.(name|slug)" "app/views/common"Length of output: 299
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
app/schemas/models/ai_document.schema.js (2)
22-22: Clarify the Description of the 'type' PropertyUsing 'etc' in the description can be ambiguous. To improve clarity, specify all possible types or indicate that the field accepts any string representing the document type.
Consider updating the description:
- type: { type: 'string', title: 'Type', description: 'The type of document: html, link etc' }, + type: { type: 'string', title: 'Type', description: 'The type of document (e.g., "html", "link")' },
27-30: Add Validation for New 'source' Properties Based on 'type'The properties
url,preText,postText, andlinkTexthave been added to thesourceobject. Consider adding validation to ensure these properties are appropriately required based on thetypeof the document to prevent incomplete or inconsistent data entries.app/views/editor/modal/NewModelModal.js (2)
34-34: Consider renaming the flag for better clarityThe property name
hasNoNamePropertyuses a double negative which can be confusing. Consider renaming it to something more intuitive likeisNameOptionalorskipNameField.
40-43: Add validation and documentation for name handlingThe conditional name setting looks good, but consider these improvements:
- Add JSDoc to document the new
hasNoNamePropertyoption- Add validation to ensure name isn't accidentally set when
hasNoNamePropertyis truemakeNewModel () { const model = new this.modelClass() const name = this.$el.find('#name').val() + // Validate that name isn't provided when it shouldn't be + if (this.hasNoNameProperty && name) { + console.warn('Name provided for model that should not have name property') + } if (!this.hasNoNameProperty) { model.set('name', name) }app/views/common/SearchView.js (1)
77-78: Simplify property initialization and add defaultsThe property initialization could be improved:
- Use object destructuring with defaults for cleaner initialization
- Add explicit default for
hasNoNamePropertyconstructor (options) { super(options) this.runSearch = this.runSearch.bind(this) this.runSearch = _.debounce(this.runSearch, 500) - this.modelProperties = options.modelProperties || this.modelProperties || {} - this.hasNoNameProperty = options.hasNoNameProperty || this.hasNoNameProperty + const { modelProperties = {}, hasNoNameProperty = false } = options + this.modelProperties = modelProperties + this.hasNoNameProperty = hasNoNameProperty }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
app/schemas/models/ai_document.schema.js(1 hunks)app/templates/editor/modal/new-model-modal.pug(1 hunks)app/views/common/SearchView.js(2 hunks)app/views/editor/ai-document/AIDocumentEditView.js(1 hunks)app/views/editor/ai-document/AIDocumentSearchView.js(1 hunks)app/views/editor/modal/NewModelModal.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
app/views/editor/modal/NewModelModal.js
[error] 38-38: A constructor name should not start with a lowercase letter.
(new-cap)
app/views/editor/ai-document/AIDocumentEditView.js
[error] 138-138: 'TreemaNode' is not defined.
(no-undef)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
app/views/editor/ai-document/AIDocumentSearchView.js
[error] 17-17: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 18-18: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 19-19: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 20-20: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 21-21: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 22-22: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 23-23: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 24-24: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 25-25: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/templates/editor/modal/new-model-modal.pug (1)
8-11: Conditional Rendering of 'Name' Field Implemented Correctly
The 'Name' field is conditionally rendered based on view.hasNoNameProperty, allowing flexibility for models that do not require a name property. The implementation aligns with the intended functionality.
app/views/common/SearchView.js (1)
145-145: LGTM: Clean modal instantiation with new properties
The modal instantiation correctly passes all required properties including the new hasNoNameProperty flag.
| @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ module.exports = (AIDocumentEditView = (function () { | |||
| return AIDocumentEditView | |||
| })()) | |||
|
|
|||
| class DocumentByTypeNode extends TreemaNode.nodeMap.string { | |||
| class DocumentByTypeNode extends TreemaNode.nodeMap.object { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Undefined 'TreemaNode': Ensure 'TreemaNode' is Imported or Defined
At line 138, 'TreemaNode' is not defined, which will result in a reference error. Please import or define 'TreemaNode' before using it.
Apply this diff to import 'TreemaNode':
+ const TreemaNode = require('path/to/treema');Ensure the correct path is used for the import based on your project structure.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 138-138: 'TreemaNode' is not defined.
(no-undef)
| this.prototype.modelLabel = 'AI Document' | ||
| this.prototype.model = require('models/AIDocument') | ||
| this.prototype.modelURL = '/db/ai_document' | ||
| this.prototype.tableTemplate = require('app/templates/editor/ai-document/table') | ||
| this.prototype.projection = ['type', 'source'] | ||
| this.prototype.page = 'ai-document' | ||
| this.prototype.canMakeNew = false | ||
| this.prototype.canMakeNew = true | ||
| this.prototype.hasNoNameProperty = true | ||
| this.prototype.modelProperties = { | ||
| source: { | ||
| type: 'link', | ||
| }, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace 'this' with Class Name in Static Method to Avoid Confusion
Using this inside a static method can be misleading since this refers to the class itself. It's clearer and more maintainable to use the class name directly when assigning prototype properties.
Apply this diff to replace this with the class name:
- this.prototype.id = 'editor-ai-document-home-view'
- this.prototype.modelLabel = 'AI Document'
- this.prototype.canMakeNew = true
- this.prototype.hasNoNameProperty = true
- this.prototype.modelProperties = {
+ AIDocumentSearchView.prototype.id = 'editor-ai-document-home-view'
+ AIDocumentSearchView.prototype.modelLabel = 'AI Document'
+ AIDocumentSearchView.prototype.canMakeNew = true
+ AIDocumentSearchView.prototype.hasNoNameProperty = true
+ AIDocumentSearchView.prototype.modelProperties = {
source: {
type: 'link',
},
}This change will also resolve the linter errors reported by Biome regarding the use of this in a static context.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 17-17: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 18-18: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 19-19: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 20-20: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 21-21: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 22-22: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 23-23: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 24-24: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 25-25: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
…t and update schema of ai_document
fixes ENG-1504
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
url,preText,postText, andlinkText.Bug Fixes
Documentation