Fix #380, bug in code that reads Enums #454
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In turning a
ValueRef::Enum
to aValue
, the code was inappropriately indexing with the row index directly into the dictionary's string array, so iterating any query's results was effectively just listing the Enum variants in order until row index > number of variants and it panicked. Fix by getting the row/col value (the dictionary key) and using that to index into the dictionary's string array.You can see it in all three branches of the match statement at value_ref.rs#L245. These call DictionaryArray.values(), whose docstring says clearly that it returns the dictionary values.
Note that this code was covered by a test, but the expected value was hardcoded incorrectly to make the previous implementation pass. Proof that the old expected value was incorrect and the new one is correct: