8000 Update Flutter SDK constraint in integration test to match templates by mit-mit · Pull Request #75772 · flutter/flutter · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Update Flutter SDK constraint in integration test to match templates #75772

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2021
Merged

Update Flutter SDK constraint in integration test to match templates #75772

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2021

Conversation

mit-mit
Copy link
Member
@mit-mit mit-mit commented Feb 10, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Description

Align integration test template with new tool templates, removing unused upper constraint

Related Issues

#68437

@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard bot added the c: contributor-productivity Team-specific productivity, code health, technical debt. label Feb 10, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Feb 10, 2021
@mit-mit mit-mit requested a review from dnfield February 10, 2021 09:50
@mit-mit mit-mit changed the title Update Flutter SDK constraint to match templates Update Flutter SDK constraint in integration test to match templates Feb 10, 2021
@mit-mit mit-mit merged commit 78ce11d into flutter:master Feb 11, 2021
@mit-mit mit-mit deleted the flutterconstraint branch February 11, 2021 06:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dnfield dnfield dnfield approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c: contributor-productivity Team-specific productivity, code health, technical debt.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mit-mit @dnfield
0