You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes look good to me, pending regtests; indeed, none of these modules are used. It seems to beg the question of why our ruff check didn't catch these earlier. @zacharyburnett maybe that's a question for you?
These changes look good to me, pending regtests; indeed, none of these modules are used. It seems to beg the question of why our ruff check didn't catch these earlier. @zacharyburnett maybe that's a question for you?
it looks like fits_generator and associations are excluded from linting:
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes look good to me as well, and it does also sound like a good idea to remove those exclusions from the style checks. Thanks for spotting that, @emolter, and taking care of it @zacharyburnett.
I think it was even earlier - that commit just split the exclusions across multiple lines.
Thanks for starting this discussion @AlexKurek - it sounds like we should go ahead and merge this one assuming the regression tests don't turn up any surprises, and then look at #8651 separately. Does that sound ok to you @zacharyburnett ?
I think it was even earlier - that commit just split the exclusions across multiple lines.
Thanks for starting this discussion @AlexKurek - it sounds like we should go ahead and merge this one assuming the regression tests don't turn up any surprises, and then look at #8651 separately. Does that sound ok to you @zacharyburnett ?
These changes look good to me as well, and it does also sound like a good idea to remove those exclusions from the style checks. Thanks for spotting that, @emolter, and taking care of it @zacharyburnett.
made a separate PR to remove those exclusions #8652
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves JP-nnnn
Closes #
This PR addresses ...
Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)
CHANGES.rst
within the relevant release sectionHow to run regression tests on a PR